Seasonal And Spatial Hydrochemistry of Agricultural Collector-Drainage Water in The Navoi–Bukhara Irrigation Zone (Uzbekistan): Salinity, Sodicity, Fluoride and Boron As Constraints on Reuse
Downloads
Collector-drainage water (CDW) from irrigated agriculture is a large but under-used water source in the arid lower reaches of Central Asian river basins, yet its seasonal composition is rarely documented at the resolution needed for reuse planning. This study characterised the seasonal and spatial hydrochemistry of CDW in a collector of the Navoi–Bukhara irrigation zone (Uzbekistan). Samples were collected at three sites along the collector during four agronomic periods of 2025 (winter leaching, spring, summer vegetation irrigation and autumn) and analysed for more than 20 parameters. At the outlet site, total dissolved solids (TDS) ranged from 2.8 to 7.2 g L⁻¹ and specific conductance (κ₂₅) from 4.2 to 9.8 mS cm⁻¹. The water was of sulfate–chloride sodium type in all seasons (Na⁺ 62–68 % of cation equivalents; sodium adsorption ratio 9.2–18.2), with Na⁺/Cl⁻ equivalent ratios above unity. Salinity, hardness, fluoride (up to 4.8 mg L⁻¹) and boron (up to 3.5 mg L⁻¹) peaked during winter leaching, whereas summer irrigation diluted the salts but raised phosphate (4.5 mg L⁻¹) and chemical oxygen demand (COD, 110 mg O₂ L⁻¹). The nearly constant F⁻/TDS (0.67–0.75 mg g⁻¹) and B/TDS (0.43–0.49 mg g⁻¹) ratios point to a common geogenic origin of fluoride, boron and salts. Along the collector, salinity and fluoride increased downstream while phosphate, nitrate and COD decreased despite rising salinity, indicating in-channel attenuation. Heavy metals occurred at trace levels (≤ 0.045 mg L⁻¹). Salinity, chloride, sodium, fluoride and boron exceeded FAO irrigation guidelines in every season, and phosphate and COD exceeded national limits. κ₂₅ was linearly related to TDS (r = 0.999), supporting low-cost conductivity monitoring as a real-time proxy for the salinity-, fluoride- and boron-dominated leaching regime. The governing constraint on reuse thus shifts from geogenic contaminants in winter–spring to agrochemical contaminants in summer, which must be reflected in any treatment or reuse scheme.
Micklin, P., 2007. The Aral Sea disaster. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 35, 47–72.
Tanji, K.K., Kielen, N.C., 2002. Agricultural drainage water management in arid and semi-arid areas. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 61. FAO, Rome.
Crosa, G., Froebrich, J., Nikolayenko, V., Stefani, F., Galli, P., Calamari, D., 2006. Spatial and seasonal variations in the water quality of the Amu Darya River (Central Asia). Water Res. 40, 2237–2245.
Törnqvist, R., Jarsjö, J., Karimov, B., 2011. Health risks from large-scale water pollution: Trends in Central Asia. Environ. Int. 37, 435–442.
Ibrakhimov, M., Khamzina, A., Forkutsa, I., Paluasheva, G., Lamers, J.P.A., Tischbein, B., Vlek, P.L.G., Martius, C., 2007. Groundwater table and salinity: Spatial and temporal distribution and influence on soil salinization in Khorezm region (Uzbekistan, Aral Sea Basin). Irrig. Drain. Syst. 21, 219–236.
Kulmatov, R., Mirzaev, J., Abuduwaili, J., Karimov, B., 2020. Challenges for the sustainable use of water and land resources under a changing climate and increasing salinization in the Jizzakh irrigation zone of Uzbekistan. J. Arid Land 12, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-020-0092-8
Kulmatov, R., Mirzaev, J., Taylakov, A., Abuduwaili, J., Karimov, B., 2021. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of collector-drainage waters in Aral Sea Basin: trends in Jizzakh region, Republic of Uzbekistan. Environ. Earth Sci. 80, 122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09406-y
Ayers, R.S., Westcot, D.W., 1985. Water quality for agriculture. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29 Rev. 1. FAO, Rome.
Rhoades, J.D., Kandiah, A., Mashali, A.M., 1992. The use of saline waters for crop production. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 48. FAO, Rome.
Greenlee, L.F., Lawler, D.F., Freeman, B.D., Marrot, B., Moulin, P., 2009. Reverse osmosis desalination: Water sources, technology, and today's challenges. Water Res. 43, 2317–2348.
ISO 5667-3:2018. Water quality — Sampling — Part 3: Preservation and handling of water samples. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
APHA, AWWA, WEF, 2017. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 23rd ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
Hayashi, M., 2004. Temperature-electrical conductivity relation of water for environmental monitoring and geophysical data inversion. Environ. Monit. Assess. 96, 119–128.
ISO 9390:1990. Water quality — Determination of borate — Spectrometric method using azomethine-H. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
Piper, A.M., 1944. A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water-analyses. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 25, 914–928.
Parkhurst, D.L., Appelo, C.A.J., 2013. Description of input and examples for PHREEQC version 3. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, Book 6, Chap. A43.
WHO, 2022. Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating the first and second addenda. World Health Organization, Geneva.




.png)