Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the novice teachers’ perception of gaps between theory and practice. Novice teachers’ perceptions were further explored based on teachers’ gender. The survey method was used to collect the data. A questionnaire was developed by the researcher consisted of 39 items with 5 points Likert rating scale to collect data from randomly selected 600 teachers including male and female. The data were analyzed by using the mean, standard deviation, and percentage of each five points of the Likert rating scale. The results revealed that most novice teachers were applying their learned theory in their practice regarding lesson planning & delivery, classroom management, and students’ active involvement. They were not only willing to but also were applying learned theories in their practice. It also came into the knowledge that there were fewer gaps between novice teachers’ theory and practice. It is recommended by the researchers suggested that these pre-service training centers should develop a strong and viable link to make the theory more practical, operational and up-to-date

Keywords

Theory practice perspective differences

Article Details

How to Cite
Syeda Tehzeeb Alvi, Muhammad Shahid Zulfiqar Ali, & Fahan Ahmad. (2021). Gaps between Theory and Practice: Novice Teachers’ Perspectives. International Journal on Economics, Finance and Sustainable Development, 3(3), 286-298. https://doi.org/10.31149/ijefsd.v3i3.1502

References

  1. Bishop-Clark, C., & Lynch, J. (1998). Comparing teacher and student responses to the mixed-age college classroom. Community College Review, 25(4), 21-34...
  2. Brown, L., & Coles, A. (2000). Complex decision-making in the classroom: The teacher as an intuitive practitioner. The intuitive practitioner: On the value of not always knowing what one is doing, 165-181.
  3. Cooney, T. J., & Krainer, K. (1996). Inservice mathematics teacher education: The importance of listening. In International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 1155-1185). Springer Netherlands.
  4. Cooney, T. M., Schaie, K. W., & Willis, S. L. (1988). The relationship between prior functioning on cognitive and personality dimensions and subject attrition in longitudinal research. Journal of Gerontology, 43(1), P12-P17.
  5. Dewey, J. (1902). The school is a social center. The Elementary School Teacher, 3(2), 73-86.
  6. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48(1), 1-20.
  7. Ferraz, O. L., Vidoni, C., & Boas, M. V. (2020). Bridging the gap between theory and practice: the impact of school-university partnership in a PETE program. Sport, Education and Society, 1-12.
  8. Freire, P. (2008). 2.2 Teachers as cultural workers. Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts, 208.
  9. Giroux, H. (2010). Lessons from Paulo Freire. Chronicle of Higher Education, 57(9), B15-B16.
  10. Jaworski, B. (1998). Mathematics teacher research: Process, practice, and the development of teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(1), 3-31.
  11. K., & Adler, J. (1996). Teachers as researchers in mathematics education. In In3ternational handbook of mathematics education (pp. 1187-1205). Springer Netherlands.
  12. Lester, B. T., Ma, L., Lee, O., & Lambert, J. (2006). Social activism in elementary science education: A science, technology, and society approach to teaching global warming. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 315-339.
  13. Lester, J. H. (2000). Secondary instruction: Does literacy fit in?. The High School Journal, 83(3), 10-16.
  14. Manganello, D., Persico, F., & Passarelli, M. (2020). Participatory approaches to learning design: the gap between theory and practice. Interaction Design and Architectures Journal-IxD&A, 44, 96-108.
  15. Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. Routledge.
  16. Meltzer, L. (Ed.). (2018). Executive function in education: From theory to practice. Guilford Publications.
  17. P. (1988). The tension between theories of learning and instruction in mathematics education. Educational psychologist, 23(2), 87-103.
  18. Persky, A. M., & McLaughlin, J. E. (2017). The flipped classroom–from theory to practice in health professional education. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 81(6).
  19. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1989). Explorations of students' mathematical beliefs and behavior. Journal for research in mathematics education, 338-355.
  20. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1999). Looking toward the 21st century: Challenges of educational theory and practice. Educational researcher, 28(7), 4-14.
  21. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard educational review, 57(1), 1-23.
  22. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  23. Simon, G. E. 1995). Collaborative management to achieve treatment guidelines: impact on depression in primary care. Jama, 273(13), 1026-1031.
  24. Simon, M. A., & Schifter, D. (1991). Towards a constructivist perspective: An intervention study of mathematics teacher development. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(4), 309-331.
  25. Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research.
  26. Wiliam, D. (2002). On the purpose of mathematics education research: Making productive contributions to policy and practice. Handbook of international research in mathematics education, 489-506.
  27. Williams, W. M. (2002). Teaching Children Real-World Knowledge and Reasoning. Developmental Review, 22(2), 151-161.
  28. Wittmann, E. C. (2001). Developing mathematics education in a systemic process.