International Journal on Economics, Finance and Sustainable Development (IJEFSD) implements a comprehensive and transparent peer-review process to maintain the quality and reliability of the articles it publishes. The journal employs a double-blind (anonymous) peer-review system, ensuring that the identities of both the authors and reviewers are kept confidential throughout the review procedure.

Submission and Initial Screening
All manuscripts submitted to IJEFSD undergo an initial review by the editorial team to evaluate their alignment with the journal’s focus and guidelines. Submissions that pass this screening process are assigned a unique identification number for further steps in the review process.

Peer Review
Manuscripts that meet the initial criteria are sent for peer review, typically by two independent experts in the relevant field. These reviewers are selected based on their qualifications, experience, and contributions to the field. If the reviewers have differing opinions, additional reviewers may be sought to ensure a thorough evaluation.

Double-Blind Review
In line with the journal’s commitment to fairness, IJEFSD follows a double-blind review process. This means that neither the authors’ nor the reviewers’ identities are revealed to each other, helping to eliminate potential bias and maintain objectivity in the evaluation process.

Review Criteria
Reviewers are asked to evaluate manuscripts based on several criteria, including:

• Scientific rigor
• Originality of the research
• Relevance to the journal’s scope
• Clarity and structure of the presentation
• Compliance with ethical standards

Reviewers are encouraged to provide constructive feedback and suggestions that can help authors improve the quality of their work.

Review Timeline
IJEFSD aims to facilitate a prompt and efficient peer-review process. Reviewers are provided with a set time frame to complete their assessments, and authors will be notified of the expected review timeline during the submission or revision stages.

Decision and Revision
Once the peer review is complete, the editorial team evaluates the feedback from the reviewers. Authors will receive one of the following decisions: acceptance, minor or major revisions, or rejection. If revisions are requested, authors are expected to address all reviewer comments comprehensively and resubmit the revised manuscript within the designated timeframe.

Final Editorial Decision
The ultimate decision regarding the publication of a manuscript rests with the Editor-in-Chief or the editorial board. The team carefully considers the reviewers' assessments, the manuscript’s originality, its relevance to the journal’s themes, and its adherence to ethical standards before reaching a final decision.

Confidentiality
IJEFSD upholds strict confidentiality throughout the peer-review process. Reviewers are expected to handle manuscripts and their contents with the utmost discretion and should not share any information with unauthorized parties.

Continuous Improvement of the Review Process
IJEFSD is dedicated to continually enhancing its review process. Feedback from authors and reviewers plays a crucial role in this effort, and the journal welcomes suggestions aimed at improving the fairness and efficiency of the peer review.

Contact
For any questions or concerns regarding the review process, please contact the editorial team at jurnalijefsd@gmail.com.

For Reviewers
If you have been invited by the Editor-in-Chief to review a manuscript, please adhere to the following guidelines:

• Provide a critical yet constructive review, offering detailed suggestions to help improve the manuscript.
• Review multiple versions of the manuscript if necessary.
• Ensure that all required information is provided in a timely manner, following established deadlines.
• Advise the editor on the manuscript’s suitability for publication.
• Disclose any potential conflicts of interest with the authors or the manuscript’s content.
• Report any instances of suspected research misconduct.
• If you are unable to review the manuscript, suggest alternative reviewers.
• Treat the manuscript as confidential and do not share it with unauthorized individuals.
• Do not use any content from the manuscript for personal purposes.
• Avoid direct communication with the authors and do not disclose your identity to them.
• Confirm that the manuscript is original and of high quality.
• Inform the editor if the manuscript is being considered elsewhere.
• Provide your review in English.
• Do not author any commentary related to the reviewed manuscript.