Main Article Content

Abstract





This study examined the effect of environmental cost on financial performance of listed construction and real estate companies in Nigeria. The ex post facto research design was adopted for the study with a population of six (6) listed construction and real estate companies in Nigeria as listed by the Nigerian Exchange Group in 2022. Data were retrieved from the annual reports of the selected construction and real estate companies for the period 2017 to 2021. Multiple regression analysis was used to analysed the data gathered with the aid of Stata12 statistical software. The study revealed a positive and significant effect of employee health and safety cost on return on assets. Also, it revealed a positive and significant effect of donations and corporate social responsibility cost on return on assets. The study recommended that more measure should be put in place by regulatory bodies to ensure that listed construction and real estate companies in Nigeria are environmentally friendly in their operation and make full disclosure. Finally, management should establish clear lines of responsibility on environmental matters and give a board member overall responsibility for such issues.





Keywords

Environmental Cost Employee Health &Safety Cost Donation and Corporate Social Responsibility Cost Financial Performance Return on Assets

Article Details

How to Cite
Ikechi , W. P. (2022). Effect of Environmental Cost on Financial Performance of Listed Construction and Real Estate Companies in Nigeria. International Journal on Economics, Finance and Sustainable Development, 4(11), 9-18. Retrieved from https://journals.researchparks.org/index.php/IJEFSD/article/view/3622

References

  1. 1. Agbo, B. O., Ohaegbu, O. K., & Akubuilo, F. (2017). The effect of environmental cost on financial performance of Nigerian brewery. European Journal of Business and Management, 9(17), 59-64.
  2. 2. Agboola, O. S., & Oroge, C. A. (2019). Environmental cost and financial performance: Analysis of cement companies in Nigeria. International Journal of Academic and Applied Research, 3(8), 60-65.
  3. 3. Aliyu, B. S., Moyi, M.Z., Fareed, L. Z., Sule, H. J., Nazifi, A. M., Bello, D. Y., & Auwalu, B. A. (2019). Impact of construction practices on the environment: A case study of Kano State, Nigeria. Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 12(1), 18-23.
  4. 4. Arong, F. E., Ezugwu, C. I., & Egbere, M. I. (2014). Environmental cost management and profitability of oil sector in Nigeria. Journal of Good Governance and Sustainable Development in Africa, 2(2), 12-34.
  5. 5. Belal, A. (2015). Social and environmental accountability in developing countries. In Jamali, D., Karim, C., and Blowfield, M. (Ed), Development-Oriented CSR, vol 1: 153-166, Shieffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
  6. 6. Chimaleni, J., Muganda, M., & Musiega, D. (2015). Relationship between sources of business financing and financial performance of small and medium enterprises in lurambi sub-County. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 4(7), 35-45.
  7. 7. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA, 1995): An introduction to Environmental Accounting as a business management tool. Key concept and terms.
  8. 8. Fernandez-Gamez, M. A., Gil-Corral, A. M., & Galan-Valdivieso, F. (2016). Corporate reputation and market value: Evidence with generalized regression neutral networks. Expert System with Application, 46, 69-76.
  9. 9. Gray, R., Javad, M., Power, D., & Sinclair, C. D. (2001). Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: A research note and extension. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 28, 327-356.
  10. 10. Iheduru, N. G., & Chukwuma, I. R. (2019). Effect of environmental and social cost on performance of manufacturing companies in Nigeria. International Journal of Accounting & Finance Review, 4(2), 5-12.
  11. 11. Ironkwe, U., & Success, G. O. (2017). Environmental accounting and sustainable development: A study of Niger delta area of Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 6(5), 01-12.
  12. 12. Mohammed, S. A. (2015). Capital structure and firm’s financial performance: Evidence from Palestine. A master thesis in accounting & finance, Islamic university, Gaza
  13. 13. Nuzula, N. F. (2019). Does environmental cost affect Japanese firms’ performance? International Journal of Professional Business Review, 4(1), 14–21.
  14. 14. Ofori, S., & Kwame, S. (2015). Impact of construction activities on the environment in Ghana. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 5(3), 18-26.
  15. 15. Ohaka, J., & Ogaluzor, O. I. (2018). Corporate social responsibility accounting and the effect of donations on profitability of oil and gas companies in Nigeria, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 8(3), 265-276.
  16. 16. Okafor, T. G. (2018). Environmental costs accounting and reporting on firm financial performance: A survey of quoted Nigerian oil companies. International Journal of Finance and Accounting, 7(1), 1-6.
  17. 17. Qiu, Y., Shaukat, A., & Tharyan, R. (2014). Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. The British Accounting Review, 1-15.
  18. 18. Rodriguez, F. J., & Cruz, Y. M. (2017). Relationship between social-environmental responsibility and performance in Hotel firms. Hospitality Management, 2, 824-839.
  19. 19. Sekerez, V. (2017). Environmental accounting as a cornerstone of corporate sustainability reporting. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, 4(1), 7-14.
  20. 20. Umoren, A. O., Akpan, M. O., & Okafor, L. N. (2018). Oil companies’ performance and environmental accounting reporting in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 8(1), 1-8.
  21. 21. Yantiana, N. (2020). The influence green accounting of corporate financial performance: Case study firm listing in IDX, Indonesia. International Journal of Management and Applied Science, 6 (1), 71-73.