Diversity ideology: cultural festivals and fusion of diverse socio-ethnic construct, interest and ethnic cooperation
Abstract
Cultural festivals as celebrated in Nigeria have enormous potential to drive fusion of diverse socio-ethnic construct. Our study focused on only three psychometric rationales or premise for evaluating common preference in cultural mixes. Fundamentally each ethnic group in Nigeria feels strong about the uniqueness of their culture. Distinct cultural traditions have been preserved and appreciated over history. We synthesized this construct at α = 0.05. Among others, key factors of multiculturalism (r = 0.39) (ideological condition that believe tradition must not be altered or acculturated) such as cuisines, costumes, rituals, languages did not significantly encourage fusion of socio-ethnic groups. Furthermore, among others, key factors of colorblindness (r = 0.52) (ideological condition that believe that culture has common origin “human beings” and common goals “satisfy human’s needs and desires”; and so people everywhere can bridge cultural differentia) such as local business, heritage site, Lifestyle, security correlates. However, lifestyle and security mediates in certain domains of cultural consumption that evokes fear of cultural mixing and which does not absolutely change ethnic predominant cultural mindset. Key factors of polyculturalism (r = 0.79) (ideological condition with the believe that traditions and perspectives influence each other as cultural groups continually make contact and interact) such as awareness, values, friendliness and markets appeared significant in driving fusion. Multiculturalism (p < 0.05) offers high propensity to increasing preference for cultural fusion options through increasing concerns about the impurity from the mixing elements of different socio-ethnic group
References
Apfelbaum, E. P., Norton, M. I., & Sommers, S. R. (2012). Racial colorblindness: Emergence, practice, and implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 205–209.
Apfelbaum, E. P., Stephens, N. M., and Reagans, R. E. (2016). Beyond one-sizefits-all:Tailoring diversity approaches to social groups. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 111,547–566. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000071
Bernardo, A. B. I. (2013). Exploring social cognitive dimensions of sexual prejudice in Filipinos. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 46, 19–48.
Bernardo, A. B., Rosenthal, L., & Levy, S. R. (2013). Polyculturalism and attitudes towards people from other countries. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37(3), 335–344.
Bourguignon, D. (2017). Diversity Policies, Prejudice, andWell-Being of Employees in Luxembourgish Organizations. Paper presented at the Diversity in Organizations Conference at Solvay Business School, (Brussels).
Chernev, A., & Gal, D. (2010). Categorization effects in value judgments: Averaging bias in evaluating combinations of vices and virtues. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(4), 738–747.
Cho, J., Morris, M. W., & Dow, B. (2016). How Romans feel about visitors’ doing ‘as Romans do’: Diversity ideologies and trust in evaluations of cultural accommodation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Costa-Lopes, R., Pereira, C. R., and Judd, C.M. (2014). Categorisation salience and in-group bias: The buffering role of a multicultural ideology. Int. J. Psychol. 49, 508–512. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12044
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Saguy, T. (2009). Commonality and the complexity of “we”: Social attitudes and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 3–20.
Fryberg, S. A., and Stephens, N. M. (2010). When the world is colorblind, American Indians are invisible. Psychol. Inquiry 21, 115–119. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2010.483847
Gündemir, S., and Galinsky, A. D. (2018). Multicolored blindfolds: how organizational multiculturalism can conceal racial discrimination and delegitimize racial discrimination claims. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 9, 825–834. doi: 10.1177/1948550617726830
Gutierrez, A. S., & Unzueta, M. M. (2010). The effect of interethnic ideologies of the likability of stereotypic vs. counterstereotypic minority targets. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 775–784.
Hahn, A., Banchefsky, S., Park, B., and Judd, C. M. (2015). Measuring intergroup ideologies: positive and negative aspects of emphasizing versus looking beyond group differences. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 41, 1646–1664. doi: 10.1177/0146167215607351
Hahn, A., Judd, C. M., and Park, B. (2010). Thinking about group differences: ideologies and national identities. Psychol. Inquiry 21, 120–126. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2010.483997
Hideg, I., and Ferris, D. L. (2016). The compassionate sexist? How benevolent sexismpromotes and undermines gender equality in the workplace. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 111, 706–727. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000072
Joshi, Y. (2014). The trouble with inclusion. Virginia J. Soc. Policy Law. 21, 207–265.
Martin, A. E., and Phillips, K. W. (2017). What “blindness” to gender differences helps women see and do: Implications for confidence, agency, and action in male-dominated environments. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. Proc. 142, 28–44. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.07.004
Mok, A., & Morris, M. W. (2013). Bicultural self-defense in consumer contexts: Self-protection motives are the basis for contrast versus assimilation to cultural cues. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(2), 175–188.
Morris, M. W., Chiu, C. Y., & Liu, Z. (2015). Polycultural psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 631–659.
Morrison, K., Plaut, V. C., & Ybarra, O. (2010). Predicting whether multiculturalism positively or negatively influences White Americans’ intergroup attitudes: The role of ethnic identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1648–1661.
Pasek, J., Stark, T. H., Krosnick, J. A., Tompson, T., & Payne, B. K. (2014). Attitudes Toward Blacks in the Obama Era Changing Distributions and Impacts On Job Approval And Electoral Choice, 2008–2012. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(S1), 276-302.
Pederson, A., Paradies, Y., & Barndon, A. (2015). The consequences of intergroup ideologies and prejudice for discrimination and harmony. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 684–696.
Peery, D. (2011). The colorblind ideal in a race-conscious reality: The case for a new legal ideal for race relations. Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy, 6, 475–495.
Plaut, V. C. (2010). Diversity science: Why and how difference makes a difference. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 77–99.
Plaut, V. C., Thomas, K. M., Hurd, K., and Romano, C. A. (2018). Do color blindness and multiculturalism remedy or foster discrimination and racism?. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 27, 200–206. doi: 10.1177/0963721418766068
Rattan, A., and Ambady, N. (2013). Diversity ideologies and intergroup relations: an examination of colorblindness and multiculturalism. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 43, 12–21. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.1892
Rosenthal, L., & Levy, S. R. (2010). The colorblind, multicultural, and polycultural ideological approaches to improving intergroup attitudes and relations. Social Issues and Policy Review, 4, 215–246.
Rosenthal, L., and Levy, S. R. (2012). The relation between polyculturalism and inter-group attitudes among racially and ethnically diverse adults. Cult. Divers. Ethnic Minor. Psychol. 18, 1–16. doi: 10.1037/a0026490
Rosenthal, L., & Levy, S. R. (2013). Thinking about mutual influences and connections across cultures relates to more positive intergroup attitudes: An examination of polyculturalism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 547–558.
Rosenthal, L., Levy, S. R., Katser, M., & Bazile, C. (2015). Polyculturalism and attitudes toward Muslim Americans. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 21, 535–545.
Rosenthal, L., Levy, S. R., and Militano, M. (2014). Polyculturalism and sexist attitudes: Believing cultures are dynamic relates to lower sexism. Psychol.Wom. Q. 38, 519–534. doi: 10.1177/0361684313510152
Rosenthal, L., Levy, S. R., & Moss, I. (2012). Polyculturalism and openness about criticizing one's culture: Implications for sexual prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 149–166.
Ryan, C. S., Casas, J. F., & Thompson, B. K. (2010). Interethnic ideology, intergroup perceptions, and cultural orientation. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 29–44.
Sasaki, S. J., and Vorauer, J. D. (2013). Ignoring versus exploring differences between groups: Effects of salient color-blindness and multiculturalism on intergroup attitudes and behavior. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass. 7, 246–259. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12021
Stevens, F. G., Plaut, V. C., & Sanchez-Burks, J. (2008). Unlocking the benefits of diversity: All-inclusive multiculturalism and positive organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44, 116–133.
Thomas, K.M., Plaut, V. C., & Tran, N.M. (Eds.). (2014). Diversity ideologies in organizations. Routledge.
Copyright (c) 2020 Aham Ikwumezie, Cosmas C. Alugbuo, Chigozie Ugochukwu Okoro, DR. Polycap Igbojiekwe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE), the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE) published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
