Diversity Ideology: Cultural Festivals And Fusion of Diverse Socio-Ethnic Construct, Interest And Ethnic Cooperation
Abstract
Cultural festivals as celebrated in Nigeria have enormous potential to drive fusion of diverse socio-ethnic construct. Our study focused on only three psychometric rationales or premise for evaluating common preference in cultural mixes. Fundamentally each ethnic group in Nigeria feels strong about the uniqueness of their culture. Distinct cultural traditions have been preserved and appreciated over history. We synthesized this construct at α = 0.05. Among others, key factors of multiculturalism (r = 0.39) (ideological condition that believe tradition must not be altered or acculturated) such as cuisines, costumes, rituals, languages did not significantly encourage fusion of socio-ethnic groups. Furthermore, among others, key factors of colorblindness (r = 0.52) (ideological condition that believe that culture has common origin “human beings” and common goals “satisfy human’s needs and desires”; and so people everywhere can bridge cultural differentia) such as local business, heritage site, Lifestyle, security correlates. However, lifestyle and security mediates in certain domains of cultural consumption that evokes fear of cultural mixing and which does not absolutely change ethnic predominant cultural mindset. Key factors of polyculturalism (r = 0.79) (ideological condition with the believe that traditions and perspectives influence each other as cultural groups continually make contact and interact) such as awareness, values, friendliness and markets appeared significant in driving fusion. Multiculturalism (p < 0.05) offers high propensity to increasing preference for cultural fusion options through increasing concerns about the impurity from the mixing elements of different socio-ethnic group
References
2. Apfelbaum, E. P., Stephens, N. M., and Reagans, R. E. (2016). Beyond one-sizefits-all:Tailoring diversity approaches to social groups. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 111,547–566. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000071
3. Bernardo, A. B. I. (2013). Exploring social cognitive dimensions of sexual prejudice in Filipinos. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 46, 19–48.
4. Bernardo, A. B., Rosenthal, L., & Levy, S. R. (2013). Polyculturalism and attitudes towards people from other countries. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37(3), 335–344.
5. Bourguignon, D. (2017). Diversity Policies, Prejudice, andWell-Being of Employees in Luxembourgish Organizations. Paper presented at the Diversity in Organizations Conference at Solvay Business School, (Brussels).
6. Chernev, A., & Gal, D. (2010). Categorization effects in value judgments: Averaging bias in evaluating combinations of vices and virtues. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(4), 738–747.
7. Cho, J., Morris, M. W., & Dow, B. (2016). How Romans feel about visitors’ doing ‘as Romans do’: Diversity ideologies and trust in evaluations of cultural accommodation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
8. Costa-Lopes, R., Pereira, C. R., and Judd, C.M. (2014). Categorisation salience and in-group bias: The buffering role of a multicultural ideology. Int. J. Psychol. 49, 508–512. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12044
9. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Saguy, T. (2009). Commonality and the complexity of “we”: Social attitudes and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 3–20.
10. Fryberg, S. A., and Stephens, N. M. (2010). When the world is colorblind, American Indians are invisible. Psychol. Inquiry 21, 115–119. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2010.483847
11. Gündemir, S., and Galinsky, A. D. (2018). Multicolored blindfolds: how organizational multiculturalism can conceal racial discrimination and delegitimize racial discrimination claims. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 9, 825–834. doi: 10.1177/1948550617726830
12. Gutierrez, A. S., & Unzueta, M. M. (2010). The effect of interethnic ideologies of the likability of stereotypic vs. counterstereotypic minority targets. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 775–784.
13. Hahn, A., Banchefsky, S., Park, B., and Judd, C. M. (2015). Measuring intergroup ideologies: positive and negative aspects of emphasizing versus looking beyond group differences. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 41, 1646–1664. doi: 10.1177/0146167215607351
14. Hahn, A., Judd, C. M., and Park, B. (2010). Thinking about group differences: ideologies and national identities. Psychol. Inquiry 21, 120–126. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2010.483997
15. Hideg, I., and Ferris, D. L. (2016). The compassionate sexist? How benevolent sexismpromotes and undermines gender equality in the workplace. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 111, 706–727. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000072
16. Joshi, Y. (2014). The trouble with inclusion. Virginia J. Soc. Policy Law. 21, 207–265.
17. Martin, A. E., and Phillips, K. W. (2017). What “blindness” to gender differences helps women see and do: Implications for confidence, agency, and action in male-dominated environments. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. Proc. 142, 28–44. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.07.004
18. Mok, A., & Morris, M. W. (2013). Bicultural self-defense in consumer contexts: Self-protection motives are the basis for contrast versus assimilation to cultural cues. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(2), 175–188.
19. Morris, M. W., Chiu, C. Y., & Liu, Z. (2015). Polycultural psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 631–659.
20. Morrison, K., Plaut, V. C., & Ybarra, O. (2010). Predicting whether multiculturalism positively or negatively influences White Americans’ intergroup attitudes: The role of ethnic identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1648–1661.
21. Pasek, J., Stark, T. H., Krosnick, J. A., Tompson, T., & Payne, B. K. (2014). Attitudes Toward
22. Blacks in the Obama Era Changing Distributions and Impacts On Job Approval And
23. Electoral Choice, 2008–2012. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(S1), 276-302.
24. Pederson, A., Paradies, Y., & Barndon, A. (2015). The consequences of intergroup ideologies and prejudice for discrimination and harmony. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 684–696.
2.png)
