The Velocities of Maximum Escaped Savings with than of Financial Liquidity to the Case of Mixed Savings
Keywords:
velocity of maximum escaped savings, mixed savings
Abstract
This paper is about the comparison of the velocity of the cycle of money with the velocity of financial liquidity in the case of mixed savings. This analysis is based on the cycle of money in combination with the velocity of maximum escaped savings with the velocity of financial liquidity with the influence of mixed savings. This means that used the maximum escaped savings, the enforcement savings, and the mixed savings are parts of these velocities. Thence, we compare the velocity of the financial liquidly with the velocity of the maximum escaped savings, using and the mixed savings. Then, we extract conclusions between these velocities. The method used is the Q.E. method.
References
1. Altman, M. (2012). Behavioral Economics, Economic Theory and Public Policy. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1152105
2. Anderson, M., Mckee, M., & Mossialos, E. (2020). Developing a sustainable exit strategy for COVID-19: health, economic and public policy implications. In Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (Vol. 113, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076820925229
3. Bento, a. (2009). Biofuels: Economic and public policy considerations. Biofuels: Environmental Consequences and Implications of Changing Land Use, in RW Howarth and S. Bringezu (Eds.), September 2008.
4. Bestari, P., Sinaga, O., & Saudi, M. H. M. (2019). Implementation of online tax system: Implications for the development of a public policy course. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 6(7).
5. Challoumis, C. (2018a). Identification of Significant Economic Risks to the International Controlled Transactions. Economics and Applied Informatics, 2018(3), 149–153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26397/eai1584040927
6. Challoumis, C. (2018b). Methods of Controlled Transactions and the Behavior of Companies According to the Public and Tax Policy. In Economics (Vol. 6, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2018-0003
7. Challoumis, C. (2018c). Multiple Axiomatics Method Through the Q.E. Methodology. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3223642
8. Challoumis, C. (2018d). Q.E. (Quantification of Everything ) Method and Econometric Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3150101
9. Challoumis, C. (2019a). Journal Association “SEPIKE” Edition 25, October, 2019. Journal Association SEPIKE, 2019(25), 12–21. https://5b925ea6-3d4e-400b-b5f3-32dc681218ff.filesusr.com/ugd/b199e2_dd29716b8bec48ca8fe7fbcfd47cdd2e.pdf
10. Challoumis, C. (2019b). The arm’s length principle and the fixed length principle economic analysis. World Scientific News, 115(2019), 207–217. http://www.worldscientificnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/WSN-115-2019-207-217.pdf
11. Challoumis, C. (2019c). The R.B.Q. (Rational, Behavioral and Quantified) Model. Ekonomika, 98(1). https://doi.org/10.15388/ekon.2019.1.1
12. Challoumis, C. (2019d). Transfer Pricing Methods for Services and the Policy of Fixed Length Principle. Economics and Business, 33(1), 222–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/eb-2019-0016
13. Challoumis, C. (2021a). Index of the cycle of money - The case of Greece. IJBESAR (International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research), 14(2).
14. Challoumis, C. (2021b). Index of the cycle of money -the case of Bulgaria. Economic Alternatives, 27(2). https://www.unwe.bg/eajournal/en
15. Challoumis, C. (2021c). The cycle of money with and without the enforcement savings. Complex System Research Centre.
16. Challoumis, C. (2022). Index of the cycle of money - the case of Poland. Research Papers in Economics and Finance, 6(1).
17. Challoumis, C. (2023). COMPARISONS OF THE CYCLE OF MONEY WITH ANDWITHOUT THE MIXED SAVINGS. Economics & Law. http://el.swu.bg/ikonomika/
18. Diallo, S. Y., Shults, F. L. R., & Wildman, W. J. (2021). Minding morality: ethical artificial societies for public policy modeling. AI and Society, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01028-5
19. Domingues, J. M., & Pecorelli-Pere, L. A. (2013). Electric vehicles, energy efficiency, taxes, and public policy in Brazil. LAW AND BUSINESS REVIEW OF THE AMERICAS, 19(55).
20. Goldsztejn, U., Schwartzman, D., & Nehorai, A. (2020a). Public policy and economic dynamics of COVID-19 spread: A mathematical modeling study. PLoS ONE, 15(12 December). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244174
21. Goldsztejn, U., Schwartzman, D., & Nehorai, D. A. (2020b). Public policy and economic dynamics of COVID-19 spread: A mathematical modeling study. In medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.13.20062802
22. Grove, A., Sanders, T., Salway, S., Goyder, E., & Hampshaw, S. (2020). A qualitative exploration of evidence-based decision making in public health practice and policy: The perceived usefulness of a diabetes economic model for decision makers. Evidence and Policy, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1332/174426418X15245020185055
23. Howlett, M. (2020). Challenges in applying design thinking to public policy: Dealing with the varieties of policy formulation and their vicissitudes. Policy and Politics, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15613699681219
24. Laplane, A., & Mazzucato, M. (2020). Socializing the risks and rewards of public investments: Economic, policy, and legal issues. Research Policy: X, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repolx.2020.100008
25. Menguy, S. (2020). Tax competition, fiscal policy, and public debt levels in a monetary union. Journal of Economic Integration, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2020.35.3.353
26. Porter, M. E. (2007). Clusters and Economic Policy: Aligning Public Policy with the New Economics of Competition. Business, November.
27. Schram, A. (2018). When evidence isn’t enough: Ideological, institutional, and interest-based constraints on achieving trade and health policy coherence. Global Social Policy, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018117744153
28. Schwartz, M. (2019). Social and Economic Public Policy Goals and Their Impact on Defense Acquisition—A 2019 Update. Defense Acquisition Research Journal, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.22594/dau.19-827.26.03
29. Strassheim, H. (2019). Behavioural mechanisms and public policy design: Preventing failures in behavioural public policy. Public Policy and Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076719827062
30. Sultana, A., Or Rashid, M. H., Akter Eva, S., & Sultana, A. (2020). Assessment of Relationship Among Regional Economic Development Policy, Urban Development Policy and Public Policy. Sumerianz Journal of Economics and Finance, 310. https://doi.org/10.47752/sjef.310.171.177
31. Torres, S. H. Á., & Riaño-Casallas, M. I. (2018). Public policy for safety and health at the worksite: The Colombian case. In Revista Gerencia y Politicas de Salud (Vol. 17, Issue 35). https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.rgps17-35.ppss
32. Wangsness, P. B., Proost, S., & Rødseth, K. L. (2020). Vehicle choices and urban transport externalities. Are Norwegian policy makers getting it right? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102384
2. Anderson, M., Mckee, M., & Mossialos, E. (2020). Developing a sustainable exit strategy for COVID-19: health, economic and public policy implications. In Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (Vol. 113, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076820925229
3. Bento, a. (2009). Biofuels: Economic and public policy considerations. Biofuels: Environmental Consequences and Implications of Changing Land Use, in RW Howarth and S. Bringezu (Eds.), September 2008.
4. Bestari, P., Sinaga, O., & Saudi, M. H. M. (2019). Implementation of online tax system: Implications for the development of a public policy course. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 6(7).
5. Challoumis, C. (2018a). Identification of Significant Economic Risks to the International Controlled Transactions. Economics and Applied Informatics, 2018(3), 149–153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26397/eai1584040927
6. Challoumis, C. (2018b). Methods of Controlled Transactions and the Behavior of Companies According to the Public and Tax Policy. In Economics (Vol. 6, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2018-0003
7. Challoumis, C. (2018c). Multiple Axiomatics Method Through the Q.E. Methodology. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3223642
8. Challoumis, C. (2018d). Q.E. (Quantification of Everything ) Method and Econometric Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3150101
9. Challoumis, C. (2019a). Journal Association “SEPIKE” Edition 25, October, 2019. Journal Association SEPIKE, 2019(25), 12–21. https://5b925ea6-3d4e-400b-b5f3-32dc681218ff.filesusr.com/ugd/b199e2_dd29716b8bec48ca8fe7fbcfd47cdd2e.pdf
10. Challoumis, C. (2019b). The arm’s length principle and the fixed length principle economic analysis. World Scientific News, 115(2019), 207–217. http://www.worldscientificnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/WSN-115-2019-207-217.pdf
11. Challoumis, C. (2019c). The R.B.Q. (Rational, Behavioral and Quantified) Model. Ekonomika, 98(1). https://doi.org/10.15388/ekon.2019.1.1
12. Challoumis, C. (2019d). Transfer Pricing Methods for Services and the Policy of Fixed Length Principle. Economics and Business, 33(1), 222–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/eb-2019-0016
13. Challoumis, C. (2021a). Index of the cycle of money - The case of Greece. IJBESAR (International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research), 14(2).
14. Challoumis, C. (2021b). Index of the cycle of money -the case of Bulgaria. Economic Alternatives, 27(2). https://www.unwe.bg/eajournal/en
15. Challoumis, C. (2021c). The cycle of money with and without the enforcement savings. Complex System Research Centre.
16. Challoumis, C. (2022). Index of the cycle of money - the case of Poland. Research Papers in Economics and Finance, 6(1).
17. Challoumis, C. (2023). COMPARISONS OF THE CYCLE OF MONEY WITH ANDWITHOUT THE MIXED SAVINGS. Economics & Law. http://el.swu.bg/ikonomika/
18. Diallo, S. Y., Shults, F. L. R., & Wildman, W. J. (2021). Minding morality: ethical artificial societies for public policy modeling. AI and Society, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01028-5
19. Domingues, J. M., & Pecorelli-Pere, L. A. (2013). Electric vehicles, energy efficiency, taxes, and public policy in Brazil. LAW AND BUSINESS REVIEW OF THE AMERICAS, 19(55).
20. Goldsztejn, U., Schwartzman, D., & Nehorai, A. (2020a). Public policy and economic dynamics of COVID-19 spread: A mathematical modeling study. PLoS ONE, 15(12 December). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244174
21. Goldsztejn, U., Schwartzman, D., & Nehorai, D. A. (2020b). Public policy and economic dynamics of COVID-19 spread: A mathematical modeling study. In medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.13.20062802
22. Grove, A., Sanders, T., Salway, S., Goyder, E., & Hampshaw, S. (2020). A qualitative exploration of evidence-based decision making in public health practice and policy: The perceived usefulness of a diabetes economic model for decision makers. Evidence and Policy, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1332/174426418X15245020185055
23. Howlett, M. (2020). Challenges in applying design thinking to public policy: Dealing with the varieties of policy formulation and their vicissitudes. Policy and Politics, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15613699681219
24. Laplane, A., & Mazzucato, M. (2020). Socializing the risks and rewards of public investments: Economic, policy, and legal issues. Research Policy: X, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repolx.2020.100008
25. Menguy, S. (2020). Tax competition, fiscal policy, and public debt levels in a monetary union. Journal of Economic Integration, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2020.35.3.353
26. Porter, M. E. (2007). Clusters and Economic Policy: Aligning Public Policy with the New Economics of Competition. Business, November.
27. Schram, A. (2018). When evidence isn’t enough: Ideological, institutional, and interest-based constraints on achieving trade and health policy coherence. Global Social Policy, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018117744153
28. Schwartz, M. (2019). Social and Economic Public Policy Goals and Their Impact on Defense Acquisition—A 2019 Update. Defense Acquisition Research Journal, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.22594/dau.19-827.26.03
29. Strassheim, H. (2019). Behavioural mechanisms and public policy design: Preventing failures in behavioural public policy. Public Policy and Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076719827062
30. Sultana, A., Or Rashid, M. H., Akter Eva, S., & Sultana, A. (2020). Assessment of Relationship Among Regional Economic Development Policy, Urban Development Policy and Public Policy. Sumerianz Journal of Economics and Finance, 310. https://doi.org/10.47752/sjef.310.171.177
31. Torres, S. H. Á., & Riaño-Casallas, M. I. (2018). Public policy for safety and health at the worksite: The Colombian case. In Revista Gerencia y Politicas de Salud (Vol. 17, Issue 35). https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.rgps17-35.ppss
32. Wangsness, P. B., Proost, S., & Rødseth, K. L. (2020). Vehicle choices and urban transport externalities. Are Norwegian policy makers getting it right? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102384
Published
2023-06-18
How to Cite
Challoumis, C. (2023). The Velocities of Maximum Escaped Savings with than of Financial Liquidity to the Case of Mixed Savings. International Journal on Economics, Finance and Sustainable Development, 5(6), 124-133. https://doi.org/10.31149/ijefsd.v5i6.4504
2.png)
