The Place of Mixed Methods in Contemporary Social Investigations

  • Dr. Charles Edaku Nkumba University – Kampala campus, School of Social Sciences, Department of Political and Social Studies, Nkumba University, Lyamutundwe, Uganda
Keywords: Mixed Methods, Social Investigations

Abstract

This journal article titled “The place of Mixed Methods in Contemporary Social Investigations”, analyses the importance and place of mixed methods in social research. The application of mixed methods in social investigations has for some time been misunderstood by many researchers who unknowingly find themselves using mixed methods approach and designs, though wrongly. This article is one of those that adds knowledge to the existing one and the author joins the previous scholars in this area to throw light in the application of mixed methods approach and designs in research. The importance of this discussion is that, with the knowledge gained from this article students and researchers can now approach this field with deep understanding of the philosophical underpinnings, paradigms, approaches, procedures and; techniques that inform mixed methods.

References

Austin, Zubin & Sutton J., (2014). “Qualitative research: getting started.” The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy vol. 67,6: 436-40. doi:10.4212/cjhp.v67i6.1406

Blaikie N., (2000). Designing social research. Cambridge: Polity press, 2000

Burrell, G. & Morgan, G., 1979. Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis. London: Heinemann

Cavana, R., Delahaye, B., & Sekaran, U. (2001). Applied Business Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods, (3rd ed.). Australia: John Wiley & Sons.

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

Caracelli, V. J. & Greene J. C., (1997). Crafting mixed-method evaluation designs, Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 19–32

Cooksey, R. & McDonald, G., (2011). Surviving and thriving in postgraduate research, Prahran, VIC, Tilde University Press.

Creswell J., (2003). Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.

Creswell, J.W. & Plano C. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Creswell J., Fetters M.D. & Ivankova, N.V. (2004). Designing a mixed methods study in primary care. Annals of Family Medicine, 2(1):7-12.

Creswell J. W., Plano C, Guttman M. & Hanson W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Crotty M. (1998). The Foundations of Social Research. London: Sage.

Dawadi S., Shrestha S., & Giri R. A, (2021). Mixed-Methods Research: A Discussion on its Types, Challenges, and Criticisms; Journal of Practical Studies in Education

ISSN: 2634-4629

Denzin N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Feilzer, M. Y. (2010). Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 6-16.

Finnis John (1980). Natural Law and Natural Rights, Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2nd ed.

Gayle R. Jennings, in Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, 2005

Greenbank P. (2003). The Role of Values in Educational Research: The Case for Reflexivity; British Educational Research Journal, v29 n6 p791-801 Dec 2003

Greene J. C., Caracelli V. J. & Graham W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3): 255-274

Grix J. (2001). Demystifying Postgraduate Research, A&C Black, 1 ISBN 902459350,

Heron J. (1996). Co-operative Inquiry: Research into the Human Condition. London: Sage

Holmes A. G. D. (2020). Researcher Positionality, Consideration of Its Influence and Place in Qualitative Research, A New Researcher Guide; International Journal of Education; E-ISSN: 2582-1334

Jari S. (2020). International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, Vol.8, No.2, pp.19-24; Published by ECRTD-UK; ISSN 2056-3620(Print), ISSN 2056-3639.

Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602-611.

Johnson R. B., Onwuegbuzie A. J., & Turner L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133. doi:10.1177/1558689806298224

Johnson R. B. & Onwuegbuzie A.J. (2004) Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come, Educational Researchers 33(7): 14-26.

Johnson R. B., Onwuegbuzie A. J., & Turner L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133. doi:10.1177/1558689806298224

Kumar S.N & Senthil (2019). Essential of Research methodology; Jaypee brothers Medical publishers, New Delhi.

Lynd R. S., & Lynd H. M. (1929). Middletown: A study in [contemporary] American culture. New York,NY: Harcourt, Brace.

Lynd, R. S., & Lynd, H. M. (1937). Middletown in transition. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.

Maxwell J. A. (2016). Expanding the history and range of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(1), 12-27. doi:10.1177/1558689815571132

Morse & Janice M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research 40:120–123

Mayo E. (1993). The human problems of an industrial civilization. New York, NY: Macmillan.

Morgan D. L. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative

methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3).

Olusola J. & Adeleye (2017), Pragmatism and Its Implications on Teaching and Learning In Nigerian Schools, Research Highlights in Education and Science.

Park Y., Konge L. & Artino A. R. (2020). The Positivism Paradigm of Research. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 95 (5). http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ ACM.0000000000003093

Renate K., SherbinoJ. & Monteiro S. (2022). The Nature of Evidence: Inductive and Deductive Reasoning; https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub

Roethlisberger F. J. & Dickson W. J. (1964). Management and the worker: An account of a research program conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne Works, Harvard University Press, Chicago,

Salkind, N. J. (2010). Encyclopedia of research design (Vols. 1-0). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781412961288.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Understanding research philosophies and approaches. Research methods for business students, 4, 106-135

Saunders M N. K., Philip L. & Thornhill A. (2016). Research Methods for Business Students, 7th Edition, Pearson Education Limited; ISBN1292121947, 9781292121949.

Scotland J. (2012) Exploring the Philosophical Underpinnings of Research: Relating Ontology and Epistemology to the Methodology and Methods of the Scientific, Interpretive, and Critical Research Paradigms. English Language Teaching, 5 (9), 9-16

Schwandt T.A. (1997). Qualitative Inquiry: A dictionary of terms. Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage

Schoonenboom J. R. & Burke J. (2017). How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design; Köln Z Soziol (2017) (Suppl 2) 69:107–131

Schoonenboom J. R., Burke J. & Dominik E. F. (2017). In press, Combining multiple purposes of mixing within a mixed methods research design. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches.

Speziale H. S., & Carpenter D. R. (2003). Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2005

Steven D. E. (1998). Introduction to Philosophical Issues in Nursing, 10.1007/978-1-349-14235-4, (1-5),

Tashakkori A. & Teddlie C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Tashakkori A. & Creswell J. W. (2007). Exploring the nature of research questions in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 207-211.

Kaushik V & Christine K. W. (2019). Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm and Its Implications for Social Work Research.

Woolley C. M. (2009). Meeting the mixed methods challenge of integration in a sociological study of structure and agency, Journal of Mixed Methods Research 3, 7-25

Yoon S. P., Lars K. & Anthony R. A. Jr, (2019). The Positivism Paradigm of Research; Article in Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges• November 2019 DOI: 10.1097/ ACM. 000000000000309

Yoon S. P., Lars K. & Anthony R. A. Jr (2020). The Positivism Paradigm of Research; National Centre for Biotechnology Information.

Published
2022-10-18
How to Cite
[1]
Edaku, D.C. 2022. The Place of Mixed Methods in Contemporary Social Investigations. International Journal on Integrated Education. 5, 10 (Oct. 2022), 117-130. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17605/ijie.v5i10.3539.
Section
Articles