Main Article Content

Abstract

In this article, proposals and recommendations on the use of words specific to colloquialisms have been developed to fill the lexicon of the literary language. Norms and criteria for the acceptance of colloquial words into the lexicon of the literary language have been developed. Methods of identifying gaps in the lexicon of the literary language are described. Considerations for filling them were studied on the example of the Uzbek language, and it was emphasized that the available opportunities should be used effectively. In the development of each language by people and nations, the important aspects of conversational speech are shown. It is proved that the units formed as a result of filling the gaps in the language lexicon in speech situations are stabilized in the lexicon of the literary language.

Keywords

lexical gap filling lexical gap lexical development of the language colloquial words dialectal words lexicon of the literary language

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
Khasanov, A.M. 2022. Filling Gaps in the Lexicon of the Literary Language with Colloquial Words. International Journal on Integrated Education. 5, 11 (Nov. 2022), 25-32.

References

  1. Adamska-Salaciak, A. (2021). Construal of Mental Health Problems in English Learners' Dictionaries. Lexikos(31), 1-19. doi:10.5788/31-1-1622
  2. 2. Annotated Dictionary of the Uzbek Language (O‘zbek tilining izohli lug‘ati). (2020). Tashkent: O‘zbekiston milliy ensiklopediyasi.
  3. 3. Hakimova, M. (2019). Leveling lexical abstraction in uzbek language. Journal of the Association-Institute for English Language and American Studies.
  4. 4. Hasanov, A. M. (2021). FILLING THE LEXICAL LACUNAS IN UZBEK LANGUAGE WITH DIALECTISMS (ON THE EXAMPLE OF AGRICULTURAL VOCABULARY). Scientific Bulletin of Namangan State University(5), pp. 408-412.
  5. 5. Khasanov, A. (2020). The linguocultural significance of euphemisms as a speech lacunae. Лисоний маданиятни шакллантириш: тажриба, муаммо ва ечимлар” мавзусидаги илмий-амалий анжуман материаллари, (pp. 100-105). Шаҳрисабз. From https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347463998_The_linguocultural_significance_of_euphemisms_as_a_speech_lacunae?_sg=Y_148XU38Ihf6ndjwfjW-ICs44SEJIeeORNgaB3QO
  6. 6. Mahmudov, N. (2017). Til tilisimi tadqiqi (Linguistic research). Tashkent: Classic word.
  7. 7. Majidovich, K. A. (2021). Features of Dialectal Words That Fill in the Gaps in the Language Vocabulary. International Journal on Integrated Education(4(10)), pp. 157-164.
  8. 8. Majidovich, K. A. (2021). Filling Lexical Gaps In The Uzbek Language With Dialectisms (Based On The Turkic-Kaltatoy Dialect). International Journals of Sciences and High Technologies(25), pp. 01-07. doi:10.52155/ijpsat.v25.2.2870
  9. 9. Majidovich, K. A. (2021). Possibilities of Kipchak Dialects in filling the Lexicon of Uzbek. International Journal on Integrated Education(4), pp. 287-294. doi:10.31149/ijie.v4i3.1426
  10. 10. Majidovich, K. A. (2022). USE OF METAPHORICAL WORD FORMATION IN FILLING LEXICAL GAPS IN THE LANGUAGE. European Journal of Humanities and Educational Advancements, 9(3), pp. 32-37. Retrieved from https://scholarzest.com/index.php/ejhea/article/view/2662
  11. 11. Quan-zhi, W. (2017). Lexical Gaps: Their Filling and Impacts. 6(7), pp. 748-754.
  12. 12. Rakhimjonovich, T. B. (2020). THE STUDY OF NATIONAL-CULTURAL UNITS IN UZBEK AND WORLD LINGUISTICS. ANGLISTICUM. Journal of the Association-Institute for English Language and American Studies(9(6)), pp. 68-76.
  13. 13. Sankaravelayuthan, R. (2020). Lexical Gaps and untranslatability in Translation. Strength for Today and Bright Hope for Tomorrow, 20, p. 56.
  14. 14. Tashmatova, N. C. (2022). Lexemes Expression in the Masnavi “Gulshan Ul-Asror” of Haydar Khorezmi. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 5(6), pp. 192-196.
  15. 15. Togayev, T. M. (2020). Navoi’s poetry and national folklore. ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science(06 (86)), pp. 517-520.
  16. 16. Toshnazarovna, E. S. (n.d.). Historical and Ethymological Analysis of the Music Term" Kuy". Zien Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities(8), pp. 139-142.
  17. 17. Umurzakova, M. E. (2020). THE SEMANTIC-STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTION OF SEGMENTED CONSTRUCTIONS OF THE UZBEK LANGUAGE AND THE PROBLEMS OF THEIR STUDY. Theoretical & Applied Science(5), pp. 685-688.
  18. 18. Xolmanova, Z. (2015). BABÜRNÂMEDEKİ BAZIKELİMELERİN TARİH? VE ETİMOLOJİK TAHLİLİ . Journal of Social Sciences/Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi(9).
  19. 19. Быкова, Г. (2003). Лакунарность как категория лексической системологии. Благовещенск: Изд-во БГПУ.
  20. 20. Хасанов, A. M. (2021). Комментарии по диалектным словам и отношение литературному языку. Приоритетные направления развития спорта, туризма, образования и науки, (pp. 568-573).
  21. 21. Хасанов, А. М. (2021). ЗАПОЛНЕНИЕ ЛЕКСИЧЕСКОГО ЛАКУНА В УЗБЕКСКОМ ЯЗЫКЕ ДИАЛЕКТИЗМАМИ (НА МАТЕРИАЛЕ ЖИВОТНОВОДСТВЕННОЙ ЛЕКСИКИ). XXIII Всероссийская студенческая научно-практическая конференция (pp. 179-189). Нижневартовск: Нижневартовского государственного университета. From https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45791815
  22. 22. Ҳасанов, A. (2022). Ўзбек адабий тилидаги лексик бўшлиқларни тўлдиришнинг диалектал асослари. Ташкент: BOOKMANY PRINT.
  23. 23. Ҳасанов, А. (2020). ON THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LITERARY AND DIALECTAL VOCABULARY. Иностранные языки в Узбекистане(6), 41-51. doi:10.36078/1613982881
  24. 24. Ҳасанов, А. (2021). Ўзбек адабий тилидаги лексик лакуналарнинг диалектал асослари. Ташкент: ТАШКЕНТСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ УЗБЕКСКОГО ЯЗЫКА И ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ ИМЕНИ АЛИШЕРА НАВОИ.
  25. 25. Sirojiddinov, S., & Xurramova, Z. (2020). XX asr o ‘zbek adabiyotida mumtoz she’riyat an’analari. Oltin bitiglar–Golden Scripts, 2(2).