Main Article Content

Abstract

This article analyzes the processes associated with the application of the Moon symbol in the literature. The representation of beautiful and delicate women in the symbol of the moon has been shown to be an important feature of Eastern literature. The convenience of creators through the symbolic depiction of celestial bodies in literature has been studied on the example of specific works. In poetic works, the use of the symbol of the moon in the sense of a beloved companion has long been proved. The analysis of some short stories shows that prose works are still used today to describe women of different natures through the image of the moon. In this regard, attention is drawn to the fact that the image of the sun also occurs in the adjacent position. In general, it summarizes how the use of symbols in works of art affects works.

Keywords

emblem symbol moon sun beautiful land expression content artwork

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
Nilufar, B. 2022. The Use of the Symbol of the Moon in Uzbek Literature. International Journal on Integrated Education. 5, 11 (Nov. 2022), 33-38.

References

  1. Askarovna, M. M. (2021). The Image of Abdulla Avloni in Uzbek Literature. International Journal on Integrated Education(4(12)), pp. 257-263. From https://doi.org/10.31149/ijie.v4i12.2568
  2. 2. Bafoev, B. (1988). Word variant and literary norm in the language of Navoi's works. Uzbek language and literature, 32.
  3. 3. Hasanov, A. (2020). A’ZAM O ‘KTAM IJODI BADIIYATI. Аъзам Ўктам шеърлари лексикасида интролакуналар (Xalqaro ilmiy-amaliy onlayn konferensiyasi materiallari) (pp. 550-556). Андижан: АДУ. From https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Abdumannon-Khasanov/publication/348388420_Lexik_gaps_in_the_works_of_Azam_O%27ktam/links/5ffc43d992851c13fe0361fb/Lexik-gaps-in-the-works-of-Azam-Oktam.pdf
  4. 4. Khasanov, A. (2020). The linguocultural significance of euphemisms as a speech lacunae. Лисоний маданиятни шакллантириш: тажриба, муаммо ва ечимлар” мавзусидаги илмий-амалий анжуман материаллари, (pp. 100-105). Шаҳрисабз. From https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347463998_The_linguocultural_significance_of_euphemisms_as_a_speech_lacunae?_sg=Y_148XU38Ihf6ndjwfjW-ICs44SEJIeeORNgaB3QO
  5. 5. Khasanov, A. M. (2021). ENRICHMENT OF UZBEK LEXIC RESERVE WITH KYPCHAK DIALECT. ЛИНГВИСТИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ И ИХ ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕ В ПРАКТИКЕ ПРЕПОДАВАНИЯ РУССКОГО И ИНОСТРАННЫХ ЯЗЫКОВ, (pp. 84-89).
  6. 6. Majidovich, K. A. (2021). Features of Dialectal Words That Fill in the Gaps in the Language Vocabulary. International Journal on Integrated Education(4(10)), pp. 157-164.
  7. 7. Majidovich, K. A. (2021). Filling Lexical Gaps In The Uzbek Language With Dialectisms (Based On The Turkic-Kaltatoy Dialect). International Journals of Sciences and High Technologies(25), pp. 01-07. doi:10.52155/ijpsat.v25.2.2870
  8. 8. Majidovich, K. A. (2021). Possibilities of Kipchak Dialects in filling the Lexicon of Uzbek. International Journal on Integrated Education(4), pp. 287-294. doi:10.31149/ijie.v4i3.1426
  9. 9. Majidovich, K. A. (2022). USE OF METAPHORICAL WORD FORMATION IN FILLING LEXICAL GAPS IN THE LANGUAGE. European Journal of Humanities and Educational Advancements, 9(3), pp. 32-37. Retrieved from https://scholarzest.com/index.php/ejhea/article/view/2662
  10. 10. Navoiy, A. (2012). Muhokamat ul-lug‘atayn /, 10-jild. – T.: 2012. – В. 515-519. In A. Navoiy, To‘la asarlar to‘plami (Vol. 20, pp. 515-519). Tashkent: G‘afur G‘ulom nomidagi nashriyot-matbaa ijodiy uyi,.
  11. 11. Хасанов, A. M. (2021). Комментарии по диалектным словам и отношение литературному языку. Приоритетные направления развития спорта, туризма, образования и науки, (pp. 568-573).
  12. 12. Хасанов, А. М. (2021). ЗАПОЛНЕНИЕ ЛЕКСИЧЕСКОГО ЛАКУНА В УЗБЕКСКОМ ЯЗЫКЕ ДИАЛЕКТИЗМАМИ (НА МАТЕРИАЛЕ ЖИВОТНОВОДСТВЕННОЙ ЛЕКСИКИ). XXIII Всероссийская студенческая научно-практическая конференция (pp. 179-189). Нижневартовск: Нижневартовского государственного университета. From https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45791815
  13. 13. ҲАСАНОВ, A. (2021 йил 12). АДАБИЙ ТИЛ ВА ШЕВА ЛЕКСИКАСИНИНГ ФАРҚЛАНИШИ ХУСУСИДА. Ўзбекистонда хорижий тиллар, 6(35), pp. 41-51. From https://journal.fledu.uz/uz/adabij-til-va-sheva-leksikasining-far%D2%9B/
  14. 14. Ҳасанов, А. (2020). ON THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LITERARY AND DIALECTAL VOCABULARY. Иностранные языки в Узбекистане(6), 41-51. doi:10.36078/1613982881
  15. 15. Ҳасанов, А. (2021). Ўзбек адабий тилидаги лексик лакуналарнинг диалектал асослари. Ташкент: ТАШКЕНТСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ УЗБЕКСКОГО ЯЗЫКА И ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ ИМЕНИ АЛИШЕРА НАВОИ.
  16. 16. Ҳасанов, А. (2022). Ўзбек адабий тилидаги лексик бўшлиқларни тўлдиришнинг диалектал асослари (Bookmany print ed.). Ташкент: Тошкент давлат ўзбек тили ва адабиёти унивнрситети. From https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360860809_UZBEK_ADABIJ_TILIDAGI_LEKSIK_BUSLIKLARNI_TULDIRISNING_DIALEKTAL_ASOSLARI
  17. 17. Ҳасанов, М. (2015). Қалбингга чироқ ёқай (SHIDASP ed.). (Ш. Қурбон, Ed.) Ташкент, Узбекистан: Алишер Навоий номидаги Ўзбекистон Миллий кутубхонаси. Retrieved 2015 йил 10-Январ
  18. 18. Sirojiddinov, S., & Xurramova, Z. (2020). XX asr o ‘zbek adabiyotida mumtoz she’riyat an’analari. Oltin bitiglar–Golden Scripts, 2(2).