Female Genital Mutilation as a Socio-Cultural Determinant of Infant and Maternal Mortality in Delta State
Abstract
Female genital mutilation is still strongly supported and done in some communities in Delta State despite the campaign against it. This is because of the sociocultural factors that support this practise. Determinants of female genital mutilation in Delta State's rural and urban populations are therefore examined in this paper in terms of sociocultural factors. The study made use of cognitive dissonance theory. The use of both a questionnaire and an extensive interview schedule was part of a mixed technique study. Using the Yamane sample size calculation, 400 people were chosen as the study's sample. The study's participants were chosen using a multi-stage sampling technique. To test the study's hypotheses, the Pearson Product Moment Correlation method was employed. According to the study, female genital mutilation practise complicates childbirth for both mother and baby. This is due to poor hymen cutting, which makes it more likely for the mother and child to get infectious infections as a result and put their health at danger. According to the study, female genital mutilation should be discouraged through education and increased anti-mutilation campaigns.
References
2. Adegoke, P. (2005). Female genital mutilation: An African humanist view. Ibadan University Humanist Society.
3. Ahmed, H.M., Shabu, . S.A., & Shabila, N.P. (2019). A qualitative assessment of women’s perspectives and experience of female genital mutilation in Iraqi Kurdistan Region, Basic Medical Childand Womens Health, 19 (1), 66-69.
4. Ali, A., Arafa, A.E. El Fattah, N.A. Abd Allah Shehata, D., & Fahim, A.S. (2018). Prevalence of female circumcision among young women in Beni-Suef, Egypt: a cross-sectional study, Journal of Pediatric Adolescent Gynecological 31 (6), 571–574.
5. Biglu, M. H. . Farnam, A., Abotalebi, P. Biglu, M., & Ghavami, S. (2016).Effect of female genita mutilation/cutting on sexual functions, Sexual Reproduction Health 10, 3–8.
6. Chai, X., Sano, Y., Kansanga, M., Baada, J., & Antabe, R. (2017). Married women’s negotiation for safer sexual intercourse in Kenya: does experience of female genital mutilation matter? Sexual Reproductive Health,14, 79–84.
7. Chukuezi, C. (2010). Socio-cultural factors associated with maternal mortality in Nigeria. Research Journal of Social Sciences, 1(5), 22-26.
8. Demographic Health Survey (2013). Infant mortality issues in Nigeria. Macmillan.
9. Esienumoh, E. E., Akpabio, I. I., & Etowa, J. B. (2016). Cultural diversity in childbirth practices in a rural community in Southern Nigeria. Journal of Pregnancy and Child Health, 3, 280. doi:10.4172/2376-127X.1000280.
10. Evans, E. C. (2013). A review of cultural influence on maternal mortality in the developing world. Midwifery, 29(5), 490-496. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2012.04.002.
11. Hao, C. (1990). An analysis of discrepancies in China’s child mortality rate. China Journal of Population Studies, 3, 11-15.
12. Hathout, H. M. (2016). Some aspects of female circumcision. Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology of the British Empire., 70, 505–7.
13. Jordal, M., & Wahlberg, A. (2018). Challenges in providing quality care for women with female genital cutting in Sweden. A literature review. Sexual Reproductive Health, 17, 91–96.
14. Kawous, R., Van Den Muijsenbergh, M.E.T.C. Geraci, D. Van Der Kwaak, A. Leye, E. Middelburg, A. Ortensi, L.E. & Burdorf, A. (2020). The prevalence and risk of female genital mutilation/cutting among migrant women and girls in the Netherlands: an extrapolation method, Public Library of Science, 15 (4) 023-0919.
15. Lang-Baldé, R., & Amerson, R. (2018). Culture and birth outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa: A review of literature. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 1-8. doi.10.1177/1043659617750260.
16. Marchie, C. L. & Anyanwu, F. C. (2009). Relative contributions of socio-cultural variables to the prediction of maternal mortality in Edo South Senatorial District, Nigeria. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 13(2), 109-115.
17. Mayer, E., & Sarin, A. (2000). An assessment of some mechanisms linking economic inequality and infant mortality. Harris School of Public Studies. University of Chicago Press.
18. Mberu, B. U. (2017). Female genital mutilation/cutting in Nigeria: A scoping review. Retrieved fromhttps://www.popcouncil.org/uploads/pdfs/2017RH_FGMCNigeriaScopingReview.pdf.
19. Mesike, C., & Mojekwu, J. (2012). Environmental determinants of child mortality in Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development, 5, (1), 5-9.
20. Millet, P. Vinchant, M. Sharifzadehgan, S. Vieillefosse, S. Hatem-Gantzer, G. & Deffieux, X. (2019). Lower urinary tracts symptoms after female genital mutilation: a review, Programme of Utility and Environment, 29 (4), 209–215.
21. Mondal, N. (2009). Factor influencing infant and child mortality: A case study of Rajshahi district, Bangladesh. Journal of Human Ecology, 26 (1), 31-39.
22. Odoi, AT. (2015). Female genital mutilation. Graphic Packaging Ltd.
23. Odukogbe, A.T.A Afolabi, B.B. Bello, O.O. & Adeyanju, A.S. (2017). Female genital mutilation/cutting in Africa, Transl. Androl. Urol. 6 (2), 138–148.
24. Odekunle, F. F. (2016). Maternal mortality burden: The influence of socio-cultural factors. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research, 6(12), 316-324.
25. Ogah, J., Kolawole, O., & Awelimobor, D. (2019). High risk human papilloma virus (HPV) common among a cohort of women with female genital mutilation. African Health Science. 19 (4), 2985–2992.
26. Ogu, R. N., Agholor, K. N., & Okonofua, F. E. (2016). Engendering the attainment of the SDG-3 in Africa: Overcoming the socio-cultural factors contributing to maternal mortality. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 20(3), 62-74.
27. Olusegun, L. (2012). Curbing maternal and child mortality: The Nigerian experience. International Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 4(3), 33-39. ISSN 2141-2499.
28. Onoka, C. (2010). Measuring catastrophic health care expenditures in Nigeria: Implications for financial risk protection. Macmillan Press.
29. Piroozi, B.. Alinia, C Safari, H.. Kazemi-Karyani, A Moradi, G.. Farhadifar, F . Yousefi, F Mohamadi, A. Bolbanabad, D., & Azadnia, A. (2020). Effect of female genital mutilation on mental health: a case–control study, European. Journal of Contraceptives in Reproduction Health Care, 25 (1) 33–36.
30. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF 2013). Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change. New York, NY: UNICEF.
31. Uthman, O. (2008). A population-based study of effect of multiple births on infant mortality in Nigeria. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.
32. Verzin, J. A. (2015). Sequelae of female circumcision. Trop Doct. 163–169.
33. World Health Organization. (2006). Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2015: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2015.
34. WHO (2007). Elimination of FGM in Nigeria. Plot 617/618 diplomatic drive, Central District Abuja. Family Health Department, Federal Ministry of Health Phase II Federal Secretariat Abuja.
35. World Health Organization (2010). Female genital mutilation. Fact sheet No. 241. Jun, [Last accessed on 2008 Nov 2]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/.
36. Yoder, P. S., & Khan, S. (2017). Numbers of women circumcised in Africa: The production of a total. Macro International Inc.
37. TOOMANY (2016). Country profile: FGM in Nigeria. Retrieved from https://www.28toomany.org/static/media/uploads/Country%20Images/PDF/nigeria_count ry_profile_-_final.compressed.pdf.
In submitting the manuscript to the International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE), the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE) published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.