Synonimic features of adjectives meaning positive and their collocation forms
Abstract
Over the past two decades the concept of semantic prosody has attracted considerable research interest since Sinclair (1991) observed that “many uses of words and phrases show a tendency to occur in a certain semantic environment” (p. 112). Sinclair (2003) also noted that semantic prosody conveys its pragmatic meaning and attitudinal meaning. As the first scholar introducing the term ‘semantic prosody,’ Louw (1993) claimed that the habitual collocates of a lexical item are established through the semantic consistency of its subjects. Semantic prosody has thus been closely related to collocation learning in language acquisition research. In the context of collocation learning, near-synonyms particularly pose a difficulty for most foreign language learners due to their similar denotational meanings but un-interchangeable semantic prosody (Xiao & McEnery, 2006). The present corpus-based study was designed to compare the semantic preference and semantic prosody with three synonymous adjective pairs picked up from the academic core words in COCA (Gardner & Davies, 2013). The pairs were chosen based on the following criteria: a) their meanings were checked against Collins Thesaurus Online; b) the words with more than one meaning were removed; c) the word with more than one part of speech was defined the same as its paired word. All occurrences were examined manually at the span of 4 words to both the left and right. Discussion and implications were reported.
References
Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2013). A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 305- 327. Doi:10.1093/applin/amt015. Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Liu D. (2010). Is it a chief, main, major, primary, or principal concern? A corpus-based behavioural profile study of the near-synonyms and its implications. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15, 56-87. DOI: 10.1075/ijcl.15.1.
Hunston, S. (2007). Semantic prosody revisited. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 12(2), 249-268. DOI: 10.1075/ijcl.12.2.
Liu, D. (2013). Salience and construal in the use of synonymy: A study of two sets of near synonymous nouns. Cognitive Linguistics, 24, 67-113. DOI: 10.1515/cog-2013-0003
Louw, W. E. (1993). “Irony in the Text or Insincerity in the Writer? In M. Baker (Ed.), The Diagnostic Potential of Semantic Prosodies.” Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair (pp. 157-176). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Louw, B. (2000). Contextual prosodic theory: Bringing semantic prosodies to life. In Heffer, C., H. Saunton, and G. Fox (Eds.), Words in Context: A Tribute to John Sinclair on his Retirement (pp. 41-55). Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2011). Corpus linguistics: method, theory, and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, and collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sinclair, J. (1996). The empty lexicon. International journal of corpus linguistics, 1(1), 99-119.
Sinclair, J. (2003). Reading concordances: An introduction. London: Pearson Longman.
Stubbs, M. (2002). Two quantitative methods of studying phraseology in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 7 (2), 215–244.
Stewart, D. (2010). Semantic prosody: A critical evaluation. Routledge: Taylor & Francis.
Irgashevich, D. A. (2020). Development of national network (tas-ix). ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 10(5), 144-151. Article http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2249-7137.2020.00254.2
Copyright (c) 2020 Barno Omonova Izzatullo qizi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE), the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE) published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
