Main Article Content

Abstract

 This study is aimed at examining the influence of teaching methods on the learning of chemistry in secondary schools in Buea. The study adopted quantitative research design specifically quasi-experimental research design type. Target population comprised of lower sixth students in secondary schools in Buea Municipality. The sample size comprised of 32 students selected using stratified random sampling and simple random sampling. The quantitative data was analysed descriptively and inferentially. The study established that teaching using laboratory method had more impact on students’ learning as compared to explicit teaching and illustrated lecture methods on the learning of chemistry. This indicated that teaching using laboratory method improves learners’ performance.

Keywords

Teaching teaching methods learning of chemistry secondary schools

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
Chongwain Lilly Oyoma Jehovah 2021. Approahes to teaching and learning of chemistry at the second cycle secondary school level in Cameroon. International Journal on Integrated Education. 4, 2 (Feb. 2021), 162-173. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31149/ijie.v4i2.1227.

References

  1. Adunola, O. (2011). The Impact of Teachers’ Teaching Methods on the Academic Performance of Primary School Pupils in Ijebu-Ode Local Government Area of Ogun State. Ego Booster Books, Ogun State, Nigeria.
  2. Akani O. (2015). Laboratory Teaching: Implication on Students’ Achievement in Chemistry in Secondary Schools in Ebonyi State of Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice Vol.6, No.30, 2015www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X
  3. Aigerim, M., Zukhra, S. and Bakhytkul, A. (2017). Pedagogy of the Twenty-First Century: Innovative Teaching Methods. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.72341
  4. Alcock, J. (2005). Animal Behaviour: An Evolutionary Approach. Eighth edition. Sinauer Associates
  5. Amin, M. E. (2005). Social science research. Concept, methodology and analysis. Kampala: Makerere University Printery.
  6. Anvar, M. (2009). The Comparison between Teacher Centred and Student Centred Educational Methods. Directory of Open Access Journals (Sweden)
  7. Arbuthnott, K. D., & Krätzig, G. P. (2015). Effective Teaching: Sensory Learning Styles versus General Memory Processes. Comprehensive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.2466/06.IT.4.2
  8. Ashman, G. (2021). The Power of Explicit Teaching and Direct Instruction. SAGE Publications Ltd. us.sagepub.com › en-us › nam › book273757. ISBN: 9781529731606
  9. Avis, J. Fisher, R. and Thompson, R., (2018). Teaching in Lifelong Learning: A guide to theory and practice. (third edition) (Open University Press).
  10. Ayeni, A.J. (2011). Teachers professional development and quality assurance in Nigerian Secondary Schools.World Journal of Education, 1(2):143-149.
  11. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior
  12. Beth, C. & Betancourt, D. C. (2018). Illustrated Lectures: Imagery, ideas, personae, and sites across South Asia. Dhaka Art Summit
  13. Borich, G. D. (2011). Effective teaching methods. (7th ed) Boston: Pearson Educational Inc.
  14. Bruner (1966). Towards a theory of instruction in Snowman, J. and Biehler, R.F. (2007). Psychology applied to teaching (10th Ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, M.A.
  15. Chukunoye, E. O. (2011). Beyond the Usual Approach of Chemistry Teaching in High Schools. US-China Education Review B 5 (2011) 643-653. ISSN 1548-6613
  16. Crumly, C., Dietz, P., & D’Angelo, S. (2014). Pedagogies for Student-Centred Learning: Online and On-Ground. Minneapolis, MN: 1517 Media. doi: 10.2307/j.ctt9m0skc
  17. Crumly, C. (2014). Student-Centred versus Teacher-Centred Learning. In Crumly C., Dietz P., & D’Angelo S. (Authors), Pedagogies for Student-Centred Learning: Online and On-Ground (pp. 3-20). Minneapolis, MN: 1517 Media. doi: 10.2307/j.ctt9m0skc.5
  18. Daniel, L. S.; Daniel, T. G., Daniel, M. W. (2011). Psychology, 2nd edition. Worth Publishers. p. 264. ISBN 978-1-4292-3719-2.
  19. Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P., Friedel, J., & Paris, A. (2005). School Engagement. In What Do Children Need to Flourish? (pp.305-321). DOI: 10.1007/0-387-23823-9_19
  20. Ganyaupfu, E. M. (2013). Teaching Methods and Students’ Academic Performance. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention. ISSN (Online): 2319 – 7722, ISSN (Print): 2319 – 7714 www.ijhssi.org Volume 2 Issue 9
  21. Garner, N., & Eilks, I. (2015). The Expectations of teachers and students who visit a non-formal student chemistry laboratory. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 1197-1210.
  22. Garner, N., Siol, A., & Eilks, I. (2015). The potential of non-formal laboratory environments for innovating the chemistry curriculum and promoting secondary school level students’ education for sustainability. Sustainability, 7(2), 1798-1818.
  23. Green, J. R. (1994). The illustrated lecture, Quarterly Review of Film and Video, 15:2, 1-23, DOI: 10.1080/10509209409361430
  24. Hannafin, M. J., & Hannafin, K. M. (2010). Cognition and student-centred, web-based learning: Issues and implications for research and theory. In Learning and instruction in the digital age (pp. 11-23). Springer US.
  25. Högström, P., Ottander, C., & Benckert, S. (2010). Lab Work and Learning in Secondary School Chemistry: The Importance of Teacher and Student Interaction. Research in Science Education. 40. 505-523. 10.1007/s11165-009-9131-3.
  26. Hofstein A., Kipnis M., Abrahams I. (2013) How to Learn in and from the Chemistry Laboratory. In: Eilks I., Hofstein A. (eds) Teaching Chemistry – A Study book. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-140-5_6
  27. Holden, D. K. (2009). A case study of the effects of a teaching method on students' academic achievement in life science and the use of self-regulated learning strategies. http://www.journal.au.edu/scholar/2009/word/DianaK-Holden13-17.doc.
  28. Hunt, J. R. (1991). Illustrated lecture. J Child Neurol. 1991 Oct;6(4):343-54. PMID: 1940137 DOI: 10.1177/088307389100600411
  29. Ireri, B. N., Omwenga, E. I., & Wario R. (2017). Approach for Technology Supported Instructions in Handbook of Research on Learner-Centred Pedagogy in Teacher Education and Professional Development. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0892-2.ch007
  30. Jones, Leo. (2007). The Student-Centred Classroom. Cambridge University Press.
  31. Kristen, K.B, Malinda, W. G, Monica, D. Kendra, M. (2017). Pedagogical Methods and Technology Used in Chemistry Secondary Education. Mod. Chem appl 5: 223. doi: 10.4172/2329-6798.1000223
  32. Lemke, J.L. (1997). Cognition, Context, and Learning: A Social Semiotic Perspective. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.) Situated Cognition: Social, Semiotic, and Psychological Perspectives, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  33. Maheswari, J. (2019). Relationship Between Teaching and Learning. https://www.slideshare.net/maheswarijaikumar/relationship-between-teaching-learning-177830409
  34. Mazur, J.E. (2013). Learning and Behaviour (7th ed.). Pearson.
  35. McKee, E., Williamson, V.M. & Ruebush, L.E. (2007). Effects of a Demonstration Laboratory on Student Learning. J Sci Educ Technol 16, 395–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9064-4
  36. Mehri, E. & Mohammad, N. (2016). A study on chemistry teaching methods, experimental analysis by student-teachers in internship lessons. Journal of Current Research in Science. J. Curr. Res. Sci. Vol., (2), 496-504, 2016. ISSN 2322-5009
  37. Missingham, D. & Matthews, R. (2014). A democratic and student-centred approach to facilitating teamwork learning among first-year engineering students: a learning and teaching case study, European Journal of Engineering Education, 39:4, 412-423, DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2014.881321
  38. Moore, K. D. (2007). Classroom Teaching Skills. New York. McGraw-Hill Higher Education
  39. Peck, M. L., & Williamson, V. M., (2001). Experiences in chemistry. Hayden McNeil Publishing, Plymouth, MI, p 49.
  40. Peyrefitte, M., Lazar, G. (2017). Student-centred Pedagogy and Real-world Research: Using Documents as Sources of Data in Teaching Social Science Skills and Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X17727835
  41. Randler, C. & Hulde, M. (2007). Hands‐on versus teacher‐centred experiments in soil ecology. Research in Science & Technological Education Volume 25, 2007 - Issue 3 Pages 329-338 https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140701535091
  42. Salkind, N. J. (2008). Explicit teaching. In Encyclopedia of educational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 385-386). SAGE Publications, Inc., https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781412963848.n102
  43. Snowman, J. & McCown, R.R. (2015). Psychology applied to teaching (14th Ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. ISBN10:1-285-73455-6
  44. Tambo,L.I. (2012). Principles and methods of teaching: Applications inCameroon schools. Limbe. ANUCAM.
  45. Tchombe, T. M. (2009). Psychological Parameters in Teaching. Presses Universitaires d′Afrique
  46. Thomas L. (2020). An introduction to quasi-experimental designs. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/quasi-experimental-design/
  47. Varatta, K. (2017). Teacher-centred Versus Learner-Centred Learning. https://knowledgeworks.org/resources/learner-centered-learning/
  48. Wilson, M. L. (2011) Students' learning preferences and teachers' instructional strategies: Correlations between matched styles and academic achievement. Unpublished dissertation, Liberty Univer., Lynchburg, VA. Google Scholar.
  49. Yara, P. O. (2010). Adequacy of Resource Materials and Mathematics Achievement of Senior Secondary Schools in South-western. Nigeria journal of social sciences. Vol. 5.1