Main Article Content


Language skills help children get some more information and improve their ability to understand, interact and socialize with other learners in the teaching/learning process. This study was designed to investigate how early childhood educational experiences influence the language development of children in primary schools in Buea municipality. The study employed the descriptive survey design and quantitative research methodology. The simple random sampling technique and the snowball were used to collect data from a total sample of 30 primary school teachers. The main instrument used for this study was the questionnaire. Data collected were analyzed descriptively using means and percentages computed with the help of the SPSS. Findings of the study revealed that: 1) there is a significant influence of teachers’ teaching methods on the development of language skills by primary school pupils in the Buea Municipality; and 2) Home environment has a significant influence on the development of language skills by primary school children in Buea. Based on these findings, it was recommended that teachers should be encouraged to make use of more interactive teaching methods that engage the learners; parents should provide assistance to young children in their learning, provide learning materials for them and expose them to the schools language of instruction. Again, the state should invest more on the provision of instructional materials for the teaching of pupils in basis education


Early childhood education teaching methods home environment language development

Article Details

How to Cite
Ajongakoh Raymond Bella 2021. The influence of early childhood educational experiences on the language development of primary school children in the buea municipality. International Journal on Integrated Education. 4, 2 (Feb. 2021), 283-298. DOI:


  1. Abels, A. A. (1999). School plant planning and facilities management. Lagos: Frank-Unity (Nigeria) Ltd.
  2. Adams, A. A. (2001). Instructional resources and school effectiveness in private and public secondary schools in Lagos state. Lagos Journal of Educational Administration and Planning 1(1), 74-81.
  3. Akinbote, M. (2010). Early childhood needs theory overview. Lagos: Frank-Unity (Nigeria) Ltd.
  4. Anene, S. (2005). The relationship between parenting design variables and scores on the Iowa test of language basic skills. Athens, Ga: University of Georgia.
  5. Awe, T. V. (2000). A consideration of the adequacy of teaching facilities in the early childhood of south western zone. Lagos: Frank-Unity (Nigeria) Ltd.
  6. Biechler, G. W. (2006). Relation of student achievement and characteristics in language development in two selected school facility environmental settings. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 64th Annual International Conference of the Council of Educational Facility Planners.
  7. Chomsky, N. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Pergonion Press
  8. Cous, R. (2003). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the parenting and second language classroom. New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Edu, E. T. (2004). School facilities management practice in Nigeria. Benin City: NAEAP.
  10. Eke, C. T. (2003). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In constructivism, theory, perspectives and practice. New York: Teachers College Press
  11. Esuah, B. B. (2003). Learning theories and the design of language environments. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America
  12. Furw, E. V., & Benedict, M. (2000). A constructivist approach to teaching. In constructivism in Education. Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  13. Hanmond, J. & Plesca, D. (2010). Investing in the future: Setting educational priorities in the developing world. Paris: Pergonion Press
  14. Hayes, D. R. A. (2010). Constructivism and problem-based learning. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 23(3), 359-370
  15. Lidz, B. (2010). Communication skills: An investigation into the relationship between computer and human performance. San Francisco, Calif.: Pacific Gas and Electric Company
  16. Magnuson, F. G. (2007). Parenting and environments affect learning. Audio-visual Instruction, 15(1), 34-35.
  17. Meziecobi, J. A. (2006). Educational facilities: The impact and role of the physical environment of the school on teaching, learning and educational outcomes. Milwaukee, Wis.: University of Wisconsin.
  18. Moravick, J. A. (1997). Assessing early childhood for learning/assessing the impact of the physical environment on the educational process. Mississippi State, Miss.: Educational Design Institute.
  19. Ojong, G. (2003). Learning, early childhood theory and instructional design. Learning Matters, 787-792
  20. Omozeghians, D. (2005). Improve your school’s atmosphere. School Planning and Management. 37(10), 18.
  21. Osakwe, M. M., Iglesias, M. P. & Torres, P. R. (2006). A new management element of childhood: Satisfaction with courses offered. International Journal of Education Management, 19(6), 505-526.
  22. Ramiro, S. P. (2013). Parenting them: motivated colour’s psychological effects on students. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 57(370), 92-94.
  23. Risely, S. (2002). Children satisfaction and quality of teaching. Managing Service Quality, 16(4), 349-364.
  24. Philips, R. W. (1997). Educational facility age and the academic achievement of upper elementary school students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Georgia.
  25. Rice, A. H. (1953). Color: What research knows about color in the classroom. Nation’s Schools, 26(3), 17-19.
  26. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press.
  27. Rocque, A. M. & Latham, S. (2006). Pupil’s satisfaction and quality of teaching. USA: Oxford University Press.