Main Article Content

Abstract

Poetry, as a kind of literature, is one of the right mediums to describe inequalities, social conditions and at the same time criticize social conditions. As intellectuals, students have a duty of conscience to always be responsible for the social, economic and political situation of the nation. Criticism should be conveyed in language that remains polite and courteous so as not to insult or incite hate. The satirical style of language is effective as a tool for critique through literary texts. This study includes library research. The results show that: 1) a sense of humor from Horatian satire can increase students' motivation in learning; 2) Horatian satire must have sharp thinking and linguistic intelligence; 3) Using Horatian satire can prevent hate speech; 4) Learning to write satire-based literature can improve students' critical, active and productive thinking skills and students' politeness of language. Through poetry, which has a unique and aesthetic language, and with a satire-horatian style, criticism can certainly be done well and accompanied by sharpness of thought.

Keywords

Poetry Satire Language Style Social Criticis

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
Firdaus, M., Agustina, S.R. and Thahar, H.E. 2021. Satire Horatian-Based Literature Learning in Higher Education. International Journal on Integrated Education. 4, 11 (Nov. 2021), 125-134. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31149/ijie.v4i11.2391.

References

  1. 1. Abrams, M. H., & Harpham, G (2014). A glossary of literary terms. Cengage Learning.
  2. 2. Allen & Stephens. (1962). Satire: Theory and Practice. California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  3. 3. Andersson, L.G & P. Trudgill (1990). Bad Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
  4. 4. Anshori, D. S (2018). Bahasa Kritik Mochtar Lubis: Analisis Wacana Kritik Tajuk Rencana Korupsi pada Harian Indonesia Raya (1966-1974). Arkhais-Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 9(1), 1-11.
  5. 5. Arslan, H (2014). Exposition of spontaneous humor in a digital environment especially in social media after social events. Journal of Media Critiques, 1(3), 95-106.
  6. 6. Azis, A (2016). Tindak Pidana Penyebaran Informasi Yang Menimbulkan Rasa Kebencian Atau Permusuhan Melalui Internet Di Indonesia (Kajian Terhadap Pasal 28 Ayat (2) Uu No. 11 Th 2008 Juncto Pasal 45 Ayat (2) Uu No. 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik). Pakuan Law Review, 2(2).
  7. 7. Balogun, J.O (210) Satire: A Reformative Weapon in Its Religious, Social and Political Functions in the Society. Zaria Journal of Linguistics and Literacy Studies. 4(1).
  8. 8. Berger, P.L (1997). Redeeming Laughter: Comic Dimension of Human Experience. Berlin, Jerman: Walter de Gruyter& Co.
  9. 9. Bloom, E & Bloom, L (1979). Satire’s Persuasive Voice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  10. 10. Cahyono, H. (2019). Peran Mahasiswa di Masyarakat. De Banten-Bode: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (PKM) Setiabudhi, 1(1), 32-41.
  11. 11. Chiaro, D (ed) (2010). Translation, Humour, and the Media, Volume 2. London and New York: Continuum.
  12. 12. Crystal, D (2014). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Oxford: Blackwell.
  13. 13. Culler, J (1977). Structuralist Poetics. Methuen & Co.Ltd: London.
  14. 14. Damono, S D (1979). Sosiologi Sebuah Pengantar. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
  15. 15. Droog, E., Burgers, C & Steen, G. J (2020). How Satirists Alternate Between Discursive Modes: An Introduction of the Humoristic Metaphors in Satirical News (HMSN) Typology. International Journal of Communication, 14, 22.
  16. 16. Dwijananti, P., & Yulianti, D (2010). Pengembangan kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa melalui pembelajaran problem based instruction pada mata kuliah fisika lingkungan. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 6(2).108–114.
  17. 17. Edhi, N. A (2020). Gaya Bahasa Satire Dalam Film ErIstWieder Da Karya David Wnendt. Identitaet. Jurnal Bahasa & Sastra Jerman UNESA, 9(3): 48 – 56.
  18. 18. Elliott, R C (2017). Satire. Encyclopedia Britannica., Available at: www.britannica.com/art/satire.
  19. 19. Firmansyah, A. U., & Agustina, T (2020). Sarcasm and Cynicism in Political Discourse on the 2017 DKI Jakarta Regional Election on Social Media. In The 3rd International Conference on Language, Literature, and Education (ICLLE 2020) (pp. 1-6). Atlantis Press.
  20. 20. Fitri, W & Yalmiadi (2018). Impoliteness of College Student Short Message Service Toward the Lecturer. Jurnal Gramatika - STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat, 4(2), 241 – 261.
  21. 21. Fritzgerald, M.A. (2004). Making the Leap from High School to College. Knowledge Quest. 32(4), 19-23.
  22. 22. Gallagher, H. L., F. Happe, N. Brunswick, P. C. Fletcher, U. Frith, & C. D. Frith (2000). Reading the Mind in Cartoons and Stories: An fMRI Study of Theory of Mind’ in Verbal and Nonverbal Tasks New York, NY: Elsevier/Pergamon, 1999; Neuropsychologia 38, 11-21.
  23. 23. Giroux, H. (2011). On Critical Pedagogy. London: The Continuum International Publishing Group.
  24. 24. Gitosaputro, S & Kordiyana K. R (2015). Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
  25. 25. Hafzah (2014). Hubungan sense of humor guru dalammengajar di kelasdenganmotivasibelajarsiswa di SMA negri 1 Sangatta Utara. Journal Psikologi, 2(1), 14-23.
  26. 26. Handono, P. Y (2018). Gaya Bahasa Komentar Dalam Akun Instagram“ Mimi Peri. Lingua Scientia, 2(2), 97–205.
  27. 27. Hassoubah, Z I (2004). Developing Creative & Critical Thinking Skills. Yayasan Nuansa Cendekia. Bandung
  28. 28. Hastjarjo, D (1999). Mengembangkan Pemikiran Kritis Mahasiswa. Buletin Psikologi, Tahun VII, No. 1.
  29. 29. Hayati, C (2018). Penerapan kemampuan berpikir kritis dalam pembelajaran menulis teks anekdot berorientasi sense of humor melalui media karikatur pada siswa Smk Kelas X. Wistara: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 1(2), 199-209.
  30. 30. Highet, G (1962). The anatomy of satire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  31. 31. Hodgkinson, L (1991). Smile Therapy: How smiling and laughter Can Change Your Life. London: Mcdonald & Co. Pub., Ltd., pp. 245-247.
  32. 32. Holbert, R. L., Hmielowski, J., Jain, P., Lather, J., & Morey, A. (2011). Adding nuance to the study of political humor effects: Experimental research on Juvenalian satire versus satire. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(3), 187–211.
  33. 33. Holbert, R. L (2013). Developing a Normative Approach to Political Satire: An Empirical Perspective. Ohio State University of International Journal of Communication. 7, 305-323.
  34. 34. Hughes, G (1991). Swearing: A Social History of Foul Language, Oaths, and Profanity in English. Massachusetts: Oxford UK & Cambridge USA.
  35. 35. Irwin, S, Sheffield, J & Thompson, K.H (2010). The Sense of Humour. Australia: Beyondblue Limited.
  36. 36. Johnson, A. W (2018). Urban (e) visualization and Early Modern Drama: Ben Jonson’s ‘Spectral Cities’. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 17(1), 26-73.
  37. 37. Jossa, S & Moroncini, A (2017). Comedy, Satire, Paradox, and the Plurality of Discourses in Cinquecento Italy: Introduction. Renaissance and Reformation. 40. 5-12.
  38. 38. Juditha, C (2015). Meme di Media Sosial: Analisis Semiotik Meme Haji Lulung. Jurnal Pekommas, 18(2), 105-116.
  39. 39. Kamaliyah, R (2015). Hubungan sense of humor guru dengan motivasi belajar PAI di SMP Negeri 2 Beji Kabupaten Pasuruan. Skripsi (tidak diterbitkan). Surabaya: Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan Universitas Islam Negri Sunan Ampel Surabaya.
  40. 40. Karyana, E (2013). Penerapan Model Kooperatif Tipe Kancing Gemercing Menggunakan Media Gambar Untuk Meningkatkan Menulis Cerita Rampang. Online, 1(3), 1-10.
  41. 41. Kemendag (2014). Panduan Optimalisasi Media Sosial Untuk Kementerian Perdagangan RI (1 ed.). (L. H. Hariqo Wibawa Satria, Ed.) Jakarta: Pusat Hubungan Masyarakat.
  42. 42. Kemendag (2014). Panduan Optimalisasi Media Sosial Untuk Kementerian Perdagangan RI (1 ed.). (L. H. Hariqo Wibawa Satria, Ed.) Jakarta: Pusat Hubungan Masyarakat.
  43. 43. Keraf, G (2010). Diksidan Gaya Bahasa. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  44. 44. Khatibah, K (2011). Penelitian kepustakaan. Iqra': Jurnal Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 5(01), 36-39.
  45. 45. Kristiandi (2009). Hubungan persepsi siswa dengan sense of humor guru dengan motivasi belajar di kelas 7 internasional Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri 1 Medan. Skripsi (tidak diterbitkan). Medan: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Sumatera Utara.
  46. 46. Kuiper, N. A., McKenzie, S. D & Belanger, K. A (1995). Cognitive appraisals and individual differences in sense of humor: Motivational and affective implications. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(3), 359-371.
  47. 47. Kumm, S., Godfrey, N., Richards, V., Hulen, J & Ray, K (2016). Nurse Education Today Senior student nurse pro fi science: A comparative study of two clinical immersion models, 44, 146–150.
  48. 48. LeBoeuf, M (2007). The Power of Ridicule: An Analisis of Satire.Senior Honors ProjectsUniversity of Rhode Island. Literature. Cambridge: Riverside Press.
  49. 49. Mahfud, M.D (1997). Kritik Sosial dalam Wacana Pembangunan. Yogyakarta: UII Press. Maret.
  50. 50. Marsh, D. (2014). Satire. In Encycloepedia of the Neo-Latin World, eds. Philip Ford, Jan Bloemendal and Charles Fantazzi, 413–423. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar.
  51. 51. Muawal, A. (2014). Fenomenolaugh. Yogyakarta: Ekspresi Buku.
  52. 52. Ningrum, D. J., Suryadi, S & Wardhana, D. E. C (2018). Kajian ujaran kebencian di media sosial. Jurnal Ilmiah Korpus, 2(3), 241-252.
  53. 53. Noriega, O & Sukendro, G. G (2020). Satirisme Cerdas Iklan Djarum 76 Filter Gold Versi Caleg Cerdas (Analisis Semiotika Roland Barthes). Satirisme Cerdas Iklan Djarum 76 Filter Gold Versi Caleg Cerdas (Analisis Semiotika Roland Barthes).
  54. 54. Nugraha, A. P (2017). Analisis Ketidaksantunan Dalam Perang Kicauan Antarkubu Calon Presiden Amerika Serikat Pada Pilpres 2016. Etnolingual, 1(2), 169-188.
  55. 55. Nurhadi, A (2017). KritikSosial Dan PolitikDalam Kumpulan Puisi “Potret Pembangunan DalamPuisi: Karya W.S. Rendra. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistic Review, 2(1): 47 – 66.
  56. 56. Nurrachmi, S & Ririn, P (2018). Etika Komunikasi Netizen Di Media Sosial (Studi Etnografi Virtual Terhadap Etika Berkomunikasi Netizen Dalam Menerima Berita Dan Informasi Pada Halaman Facebook E100 Radio Suara Surabaya). Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi UPN Veteran Jatim, 1(1).
  57. 57. Ogonna, O.S (2015). The role of satire in African literature: a critical review of ‘Ugomma, an Igbo drama by Godson Echebina’. 2nd ICLEHI: 1-11.
  58. 58. Oksinata, H (2010). Kritik Sosial dalam Kumpulan Puisi Aku Ingin Jadi Peluru.
  59. 59. Olaniyan, M. E (2015). The effectiveness of satire as a dramatic tool for societal reformation: Efua Sutherland’s the Marriage of Anansewa, Examined. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Arts and Humanities, 3(4), 1–10.
  60. 60. Pagliari, M (2018). The Tragedy Underneath: Satire and Reality. Mercer Street 2017-2018. Expository Writing Program New York University College Of Arts & Science. 155 – 164.
  61. 61. Pareira, B A (2006). Kritik Sosial Politik Nabi Yesaya. Malang: Diorama. Political Functions in the Society, Zaria Journal of Linguistics and Literacy.
  62. 62. Pradopo, R D (2011). Prinsip-Prinsip Kritik Sastra. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mata University Press.
  63. 63. Prajarto, N (2018). Netizendan Infotainment : Studi Etnografi Virtual pada AkunInstagram @ lambe _ turah. Jurnal ILMU KOMUNIKASI, 15(1), 33–46. Quintero, R (2007). A companion to satire: Ancient and Modern. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  64. 64. Ratna, N. (2013). Stilistika Kajian Puitika Bahasa Sastra dan Budaya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  65. 65. Retnasih, A O (2014). Kritik Sosial Dalam Roman Momo Karya Michael Ende (Analisis Sosiologi Sastra). Skripsi (tidak diterbitkan), Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
  66. 66. Sander, C (1971). The scope of satire. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, & Company.
  67. 67. Seligman, Martin. E. P. & Peterson, Christopher (2004). Character Strengths and Virtues. New York: Oxford University Press.
  68. 68. Sobiech, M J (2008). A Mock Rhetoric: The Use of Satire in First-Year Composition. Masters Theses & Specialist Projects. A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of English Western Kentucky University Bowling Green, Kentucky. Paper 45.
  69. 69. Soekanto, S (2013). Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada. Studies 4 No 1 Kaduna: EMS press.
  70. 70. Suciartini, N N A (2019). AnalisisBahasa Satire dalam Pertarungan Politik 2019. Jurnal SIROK BASTRA, 7 (1) 73—84.
  71. 71. Suhadi, M. A (1989). Humor ituserius: Pengantar “ilmu humor”. Jakarta: Pustaka karya Grafikatama.
  72. 72. Swift, J (2000). A Modest Proposal and Other Satirical Works.Dover Thrift Editions. New York: Dover Publications Inc.
  73. 73. Taufik, M. (2014). Resistensi Gerakan Mahasiswa Terhadap Kapitalisasi Pendidikan (Studi Organisasi Eksternal Kampus di Unesa). Jurnal Paradigma. 2(3).
  74. 74. Truett, K. (2011). Humor and students’ perceptions of learning. Unpublished master’s thesis. Texas: Texas Technology University.
  75. 75. Wahyuni, R., & Efuansyah, E (2018). Model Pembelajaran Missouri Mathematics Project (MMP) Menggunakan Strategi Think Talk Write (TTW) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 2(1), 24-36.
  76. 76. Wahyuni, S., Susetyorini, R. E., & Latifa, R. (2015). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa pendidikan biologi UMM melalui lesson study. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran, 1 (2), 187–200.
  77. 77. Walter, G. (1990). Laugh, teacher, laugh!. The Educational Digest, 55 (9), 43-44.
  78. 78. Wardani, I. R. K. (2012). Hubungan cita rasa humor (sense of humor) dengan kebermaknaan hidup pada remaja akhir (mahasiswa). PhD Proposal, 1(3).
  79. 79. Wattimena, R A.A. (2016). Demokrasi: Dasar Filosofis dan Tantangannya, Kanisius, Yogyakarta.
  80. 80. Wilson, E. (1941). The Two Scrooges. The Wound and the Bow: Seven Studies in Literature, 1-93.
  81. 81. Yasa, I N (2012). Teori Sastra dan Penerapannya. Bandung: Karya Putra Darwati.