Influence of Library Service Quality on Perceived Librarians’ Image in Selected Private Universities in South-West, Nigeria
Abstract
The professional identity and image of librarians give a vivid description of library profession. Due to the emergence of information technology, library users who are the major determinants of librarians’ image have diverse perceptions about librarians’ relevance which leads to professional identity crisis. However, existing studies on librarians’ image revealed how librarians’ status and personality traits can influence library users’ perception of librarians’ image. The study aimed to investigate the influence of library service quality on the perceived librarians’ image in selected private universities in South-west, Nigeria. This study adopted descriptive survey research design of the correlational type. Total population of undergraduate students in the six purposively selected universities was 31,342. Sample size of 1,491 was selected from the population. Convenience sampling technique was used to administer questionnaire to undergraduate students met physically utilising the library resources. The findings of the study were that perception of undergraduates about library service quality and satisfaction with services offered by librarians had relationship with librarians’ image. The study concluded that quality of services offered by librarians determine the perception and image that library users have about librarians. The study recommended that management of private universities should provide necessary resources needed for effective performance, in order to improve librarians’ image among the students and train librarians on how to discharge their responsibilities to the satisfaction of the undergraduates.
References
2. Adeniran, P. (2011). User satisfaction with academic libraries services: academic staff and students perspectives. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 3(10), 209-216.DOI:10.5897/IJLIS11.045
3. Alansari, H.A. (2011). Career choice, satisfaction and perception about their professional image: a study of Kuwaiti librarians. Library Review, 60(7), 575-587.
4. American Library Association (2004). Core values of librarianship, 20.http://www.ala.org/ala/educationcareers/corevalue/index.cfm Blake, L., Balance, D., Davies, K., & Gaines, J.K. (2016). Patron perception and utilization of an embedded librarian program. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 104(3), 226-230.
5. Calvert, P. (2001). International variations in measuring customer expectations. Library Trends, 19 (4), 1-25.
6. Cook, C., Heath, F. & Thompson, B. (2001). Users’ hierarchical perceptive on library service quality: A “LibQUAL+” study. College and research Libraries, 147-153.DOI:10.5860/crl.62.2.147.
7. Deo, S. (2016). An assessment of user satisfaction in academic libraries: a case studyof the Fiji National University Library. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2805283.
8. Gyau, B. E., Liu, J. & Kwakye, O. (2021). Evaluation of user satisfaction with academic libraries services based on students' perspectives. Open Access Library Journal, 8, 1-17.
9. Grönroos, C. (2001). The perceived service quality concept – a mistake? Managing Service Quality, 11 (3) 150–52.
10. Hashim, L.B. & Mokhtar, W.N.H. (2012). Preparing new era librarians and information professionals: trends and issues. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(7), 151- 156.
11. Hernon, P. (2002). Quality: new directions in the research. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28, 224-231.
12. Hayes, J. B., Parks, C., McNeilly, S., & Johnson, P. (2018). Boomers to Millennials: Generational stereotypes at work in academic librarianship. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(6), 845–853. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2018.09.011
13. Hicks, D. (2016). Advocating for librarianship: the discourses of advocacy and service in the professional identities of librarians. Library Trends, 64(3), 615-640.
14. Hsu, M.K., Cummings, R.G. & Wang, S.W. (2014). Business students’ perception of university library service quality and satisfaction. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 7(2), 137-144.
15. Ijiekhuamhen, O.P., Aghojare B. & Omosekejimi, A.F. (2015). Assess users’ satisfaction on academic library performance: a study. Journal of Academic Research and Reflection, 3(5), 66-67.
16. Khan, A., Bhatti, R., Khan, G. & Ismail, M. (2014). The role of academic libraries in facilitating undergraduate and post-graduate studies: a case study of the University of Peshawar, Pakistan. International Electronic Journal (38), 36-49.
17. Kiran, K. (2010). Service quality and customer satisfaction in academic libraries: perspectives from a Malaysia university. Library Review, 59(4), 261-273.
18. Ling, K. C., Chai, L. T. & Piew, T. H. (2010). The ‘inside-out’ and ‘outside-in’ approaches on students’ perceived service quality: an empirical evaluation. Management Science and Engineering, 4 (2), 01-26. Retrieved on 27/01/2020 from www.cscanada.net www.cscanada.org.
19. Luthmann, A. (2007). Librarians, professionalism and image: stereotype and reality. Library Review, 56,775.
20. Motiang, I.P., Wallis, M. & Karofia, A.M. (2014). An evaluation of user satisfaction with library services at the University of Limpopo, Medium campus (medical university of Southern Africa). Arabian Journal of Business & Management Review, 3(11), 41-58.
21. Nagata, H.Y., Satoh, S. & Kyatomaki, P. (2004).The dimensions that construct the evaluation of service quality in academic libraries. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 5(2), 53-65.
22. Ogunsola, L.A. (2004). Nigerian university libraries and the challenges of globalization: the way forward.43 http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ejasljournal/43 Ojasalo, J. (2010). E-service quality: a conceptual model. International Journal of Arts and Sciences. 3 (7), 127-143.
23. Okhawere, N.E., Isibor, O.F. & Otoghile N.S. (2017).Undergraduate students’ perception and attitude towards library services in Nigerian Universities. Research Journal of Financial Sustainability Reporting, 2(1), 208-218.
24. Olajide, O. & Fabunmi, F.A. (2011). Lecturers’ perception of the adequacy of resources and services of University Ado-Ekiti Library. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Retrieved from http:// digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/666.
25. Otieno, P., Otike, J. & Rotich, D.C. (2015). The effect of library staff attitude to work on the use of information services in public university libraries in Kenya. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Science, 2(4), 80-88.
26. Oyewusi, F.O. & Oyeboade, S.A. (2009). An empirical study of accessibility and use of library resources by undergraduates in a Nigerian State University of Technology. Library Philosophy and Practice.
27. Phelps, S.F. & Campbell, N. (2012). Commitment and trust in librarian-faculty relationships: a systemic review of the literature. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38(1), 13-19.doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2011.11.003 Posner, B. (2002). Know -it-all librarians. Reference Librarian, 37(78), 111-129.
28. Quadri, G. O. (2013).Influence of demographic factors on use of online library resources by undergraduate students in two private Nigerian university libraries. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
29. Ebijuwa, A. S. (2018). Gender differentiation and perceived ease of usage of electronic resources by University students in selected private Universities in Nigeria. Journal of Information Management, 55 (3).Retrieved on 27/01/2020 from http://www.informaticsjournals.com/index .php/srels/article/view/21595.
30. Rani, P. (2018). A study on library resources with services satisfaction based on students and faculties: In an institution. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 13(22), 15443-15450.
31. Suresha, N. (2016). User satisfaction on library resources and services in St. Claret Degree College Library, Bangalore- a study. International Journal of Next Generation Library and Technologies. 2(3), 1-9.
32. Usherwood, B. (2000). Rediscover the public librarians: your value and worth. Australasian Public Libraries and Information services, 13(1), 7-13.
33. Vassilakaki, E. & Moniarou-Papaconstantinou, V. (2016). How public library users perceive the information professionals: is the image transforming? New Library World, 117(7/8), 449-463.DOI:10.1108/NLW-11-2015-0090.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE), the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE) published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.