Quantitative in Morphological Classification

  • M. N. Mamadjanova Senior Teacher of Kokand State Pedagogical Institute
Keywords: number, opposition, emotionality, set, quantitative comparison

Abstract

The article discusses the fundamentals of morphological categorization as well as the relationship between quantitativeity and classification issues. Explanation of practical methods. In addition, the methods used in the fusion are examined.

References

1. Menovshikov G.A. Ways of expressing singularity-multiplicity in languages of different types. Problems of Linguistics.—1970. -№1.–P.82-88.
2. Kravtsova S. I. Phraseological units with the meaning of quantity in the Russian language. Candidate of Philological Sciences dissertation. Rostov n/d., 1981.
3. Lashkevich A.I. Genetic constructions with the meaning of metaphorical quantity in modern Russian. Candidate of Philological Sciences. Minsk, 1976.
4. Manuilov N.V. The Uncertainty Category in the Structure of Scientific Cognition. Candidate of Philological Sciences.—Л., 1985.
5. Igoshina T.V. Morphotemic analysis of the category of quantitativity in different-system languages (on the material of the Russian and English languages): abstract. candidate of philological sciences.Ulyanovsk, 2002.-p.6-9.
6. Y.Zulfiev Y. Peculiarities of collective category .Uzbek language and literature, 1975,Issue 4.
7. Ergashova M.V. Localization relations in the Uzbek language // The Future of Science. 2016. -P.90.
8. E.Fayzullaeva E. Unity and its categorical essence.// Uzbek language and literature. 1985. Issue 5.
9. Nurmonov A., Teshaboev A., Sofikhojaev N. Problems of standardization of terms of natural and exact sciences //Educational problems.2000.Issue 3.
10. Qilichev E. Lexical means of artistic image.-Tashkent: Science. 1982. -Б.89.
Published
2022-04-12
How to Cite
[1]
Mamadjanova, M.N. 2022. Quantitative in Morphological Classification. International Journal on Integrated Education. 5, 4 (Apr. 2022), 114-116. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17605/ijie.v5i4.2948.
Section
Articles