Empirical Analysis of Factors Responsible for Effective Student-Centred Education Framework

  • Menoja Nathaniel Akokaike Centre for Petroleum Energy Economics and Law (CPEEL) University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Planning Officer I, Ministry of Budget & Economic Planning, Bayelsa State
  • Christopher O. Ewhrudjakpo Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Education, Bayelsa State
Keywords: Student-Centred Education, classroom architecture, teaching load, duration of teaching period, Teachers’ motivation, class size, social and cultural belief system

Abstract

The research investigated the factors responsible for effective students-centered education framework, using primary data. The study was motivated by the fact that student-centered education framework has not been fully practiced to yield the needed returns our education system requires, despites government’s effort at different times to improve the standard and quality of education. The specific objectives included to determine whether cultural and social belief system is a reason for effective student-centered educational framework in public secondary schools, whether schools architecture and infrastructure is a reason for effective student-centered educational framework in public secondary Schools, whether duration of teaching period is a reason for effective student-centered educational framework in public secondary schools, whether motivation for teachers is a reason for effective student-centered educational framework in public secondary schools, whether teaching load is a reason for effective student-centered educational framework in public secondary schools; and whether class size is a reason for effective student-centered educational framework in public secondary schools. The study employed descriptive survey design. Data collected from the field were analyzed, by the researchers using Pearson's Correlation Moments. The Findings indicated that classroom architectures and infrastructure, teaching period, social and cultural belief system have positive and significant relationship with effective student-centered education framework. It was concluded that Student-centered education framework is imperative as major commanding height to attain effective learning. It was recommended that standard classroom architecture with smart technology should be initiated in schools by government and/or through public-private partnership. In addition, teachers should be adequately and timely incentivized with adequate provision of e-learning tools to teachers such as laptops, internet connectivity in schools with stable and quality electricity supply in schools. In the same vein, more teachers especially, mathematics and science teachers should be recruited and evenly posted or distributed across the State in order to mitigate heavy teaching load and large class size and lopsidedness.

References

1. Atweh, B.(2013). Beyond Student Centred Learning: Towards Socially Response-able Mathematics Education’, keynote presentation at Columbia University, viewed 21 May 2013 http://oneworldripples.com/ uploads/3/2/1/3/3213041/keynote_address_colombia_atweh.pdf
2. Black, R.(2007). Crossing the bridge: overcoming entrenched disadvantage through student-centred learning, Australian Education Foundation, viewed 21 May 2013, http://www.fya.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/ black2007crossingthebridge.pdf
3. Concordia University. (2010). Which is Best: Teacher-Centered or Student-Centered Education? Retrieved from http://education.cu-portland.edu/blog/classroom-resources/which-is-best-teachercentered-or-student-centered-education/, accessed on 8/3/17 at 12:40 p.m.
4. Dix, M.(2012) The student-centred school, National Institute for Student-Centred Education, viewed 21 May 2013, http://nisce.org/nisce-white-papers-andpublications/
5. DuFour, R. 2002, ‘The learning-centred principal’, Educational Leadership, May, pp. 12–15.
6. Education International. (2010). Student-Centred Learning. Retrieved from http://pascl.eu/wpcontent/uploads/SCL_toolkit_ESU_EI.pdf, accessed on 4/3/17 at 1:17p.m.
7. Kitiashvili, A. (2020). Teachers’ attitudes toward assessment of student learning and teacher assessment practices in general educational institutions: The case of Georgia. Improving Schools, 17(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480214534543
8. Mutlaq, A. F. (2013). The difference between the learner-centred approach and the teacher-centred approach in teaching english as a foreign language, Educational Research Journal,2(2),3-8. Retrieved from http://www.erint.savap.org.pk/PDF/Vol.2(2)/ERInt.2013(2.2-04).pdf
9. Mwangi, G. M. (2014). Influence of Learner- centered strategies on student Biology performancein Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education in Kinangop Sub-County, Nyandarua County, Kenya (Masters Thesis, University of Nairobi, Kenya). Retrieved fromhttp://eap.uonbi.ac.ke/sites/default/files/cees/education/eap/Research%20pr oject.pdf
10. Olana, E., & Amante, T. (2017). Factors affecting implementation of Learner centered learning methods. Journal of Humanities and Culture Studies r&d, 2(11), 516-530. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/31595680/Factors_Affecting_Implementation_of _Student_Centered_Learning_methods
11. Vavrus, F. (2011) Ensuring Quality by attending to inquiry: learner-centered pedagogy in sub-Saharan Africa, International Institute for Capacity Building in Africa, UNESCO, Addis Ababa, viewed 21 May 2013, http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002160/216063e.pdf
12. Yonezawa, S, McClure, L & Jones, M (2012). Personalization in schools: the students at the centre series, Jobs for the Future, viewed 21 May 2013, http:// www.studentsatthecenter.org/ topics/personalization-schools
Published
2022-04-30
How to Cite
[1]
Akokaike, M.N. and Ewhrudjakpo , C.O. 2022. Empirical Analysis of Factors Responsible for Effective Student-Centred Education Framework. International Journal on Integrated Education. 5, 4 (Apr. 2022), 271-279. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17605/ijie.v5i4.2998.
Section
Articles