Main Article Content

Abstract

Anthroponymic systems of languages reflect the history and culture, worldview and values of the people. Therefore, the study of this layer of linguistic vocabulary should play an important role in ethno linguistics, one of the directions of which is to reveal the image of the people in the language. On the other hand, the study of personal names is also of practical importance: knowledge of the development trends of the personal name system helps to influence these processes consciously and scientifically based in the context of language policy.

Keywords

anthroponymic unit anthropocentrism linguoculture onomastics asemantic naming anaphoric connection onomastic space

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
T., I.D. 2022. Names of Persons as a Central Component of Language Life of Society. International Journal on Integrated Education. 5, 5 (May 2022), 10-13.

References

  1. 1. Croft W. Syntactic categories and grammatical relation: The cognitive organization. –Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003. –133p.
  2. 2. Даниева М.Дж. Когнитивные особенности субстантивных словосочетаний в английском языке. Monograph. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing; SIA OmniScriptum Publishing. Riga: Latvia. 2018. 65 p.
  3. 3. Ellis, A. and M. Beechley. "Emotional Disturbance in Children with Peculiar Given Names." Journal of Genetic Psychology 85 (1954): 337-339.
  4. 4. Feldman, Harold. "The Problem of Personal Names as a Universal Element in Culture." American Imago16 (1959): 237-250.
  5. 5. Гальперин И.Р. Текст как объект лингвистического исследования. – Москва, 2006. – 144 с.
  6. 6. Hartman, A. Arthur, Robert C. Nicolay, and Jesse Hurley. "Unique Personal Names as a Social Adjustment Factor." Journal of Social Psychology 75 (1968): 107-110.
  7. Jespersen О. Philosophy of Grammar. – Moscow: PH of Foreign Literature, 1958. – 404 p.
  8. 7. Кубрякова Е.С. Язык и знаниe. На пути получения знаний о языке: Части речи с когнитивной точки зрения. Роль языка в познании мира. – Москва, 2004. – 560 с.
  9. 8. Lakoff G., Brugman C. Argument Forms in Lexical Semantics// Proceedings of 12th Annual Meeting of Berkеlеy Linguistic Society. Berkеlеy, 1986. –P.32-45.
  10. 9. Лосев А.Ф. Языковая структура. – Москва, МОПИ. 1983. – 374c.
  11. Murphy, William F. "A Note on the Significance of Names." Psychoanalytical Quarterly 26 (1957): 91-106.
  12. 10. Savage, B. M. and F. L. Wells. "Note on Singularity in Given Names." Journal of Social Psychology 27 (1948): 271-272.
  13. 11. Smith, Elsdon C. Treasury of Name Lore. New York: Harper and Row, 1967.
  14. 12. Топорова Т. В. Культура в зеркале языка: древнегерманские двучленные имена собственные. М.: Языки русской культуры, 1996