Academic amidst Pandemic: A Survey of the Learning Experiences among Filipino Undergraduate Students

  • Arvy James C. de Guzman Western Mindanao State University
Keywords: Undergraduate students, COVID-19, Remote learning, online learning, Mode of learning, Survey


The global spread of Covid-19 has brought significant changes in the lives of many people around the globe and has forced many educational institutions to move from the traditional in person classes to online mode of learning. Thus, there is a need to know the learning experience of the student’s despite of the sudden shift in the mode of learning. In lieu of this matter, the objective of this study is to understand the undergraduate student’s learning experiences 2 years after the global outbreak of COVID-19. This study employed an adapted Questionnaire from the study of Zhou & Zhang (2021) and surveyed 60 undergraduate students. The result of the study implies that there is a positive overall learning experience among the undergraduate students but they have a low level of mental health. The study also discovers that the undergraduate Students have an average perception of the learning community during the pandemic and they received a sufficient amount of student and peer support. Moreover, it has been found out through this study that there are more hindrances than benefits in this kind of learning set up.


1. Adler, R. W., Milne, M. J. & Stablein, R.. (2001). Situated motivation: An empirical test in an accounting Class. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 18(2), 101-116.
2. Agung, A. S. N., Surtikanti, M. W., & Quinones, C. A. (2020). Students’ perception of online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A case study on the English students of STKIP pamane Talino. SOSHUM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 10(2), 225– 235.
3. Alawamleh, M. (2020). COVID-19 and higher education economics. Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research,21(2) ,1-2.
4. Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. Theory and practice of online Learning, 2, 15-44.
5. Anastasiades, P. S. et al. (2010) ‘Interactive Videoconferencing for collaborative learning at a distance in the school of 21st century: A case study in elementary schools in Greece’, Computers and Education, 54(2), 321-339.
6. Baiyere, A., & Li, H. (2016) ‘Application of a virtual collaborative environment in a teaching case’. In AMCIS 2016: Surfing the IT Innovation Wave – 22nd Americas Conference on Information Systems.
7. Barbour, M. K., & Reeves, T. C. (2009). The reality of virtual schools: A review of the ZUO Mingzhang, MA Yunpeng, HU Yue, LUO Heng Literature. Computers & Education, 52(2), 402–416. 09.009
8. Basilaia, G., et al. (2020) ‘Replacing the Classic Learning Form at Universities as an Immediate Response to the COVID-19 Virus Infection in Georgia’, International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET), 8(III), 101-108.
9. Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to Online Education in Schools during a SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), em0060.
10. Basuony, M. A. K., EmadEldeen, R., Farghaly, M., El-Bassiouny, N., & Mohamed,E. K. A. (2020). The factors affecting students satisfaction with online education during COVID-19 pandemic: An empirical of an emerging Muslim country. Journal of Islamic marketing.
11. Benson, A.D. (2002). Using online learning to meet workforce demand: a case study of stakeholder Influence. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3 (4), 443-452.
12. Berge, Z.L. (2007). Barriers and the organization’s capabilities for distance education. Distance Learning,4(4), 1.
13. Berge, Z. L. (2005). Virtual schools: Planning for success. Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
14. Cappel, J., Smart, K. (2006). Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning: A Comparative Study. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5, 201-218.
15. Cicha, K.,Rizun, M.,Rutecka, P. & Strzelecki, A.(2021). COVID-19 and Higher Education: First-Year students’ Expectations toward distance Learning. Sustainability,13, 1889.
16. Conrad, D. (2002). Deep in the hearts of learners: insights into the nature of online community. The Journal of Distance Education, 17 (1), 1-19.
17. Cole, M. S., Field, H. S. & Harris, S. G. (2004). Student learning motivation and psychological hardiness: Interactive effects on students’ reactions to a management class. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(1), 64-85.
18. Chen, G.,Gašević, D., Guan, Q., Wen, G., Whitelock-Wainwright, A. & Yan, L. (2021). Students’ experience of online learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A province-wide survey study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(5),2038-2057.
19. Crawford, J.,Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkaw, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni, A., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(1), 1-20.
20. Croxton, R.A. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 314.
21. Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of Instruction. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and tech-nology. New York: Macmillan.Dziuban, C.D., Moskal, P. & Hartman, J. (2005). Higher Education, Blended Learning, and the Generations: Knowledge Is Power-No more Elements of Quality Online Education. Sloan Center For Online Education, Needham, MA, Engaging communities, 88-89.
22. Eble, K. (1994). Craft of teaching: A guide to mastering the professor’s art (2nd edition), New York: Jossey-Bass.
23. Fedynich, L.V. (2013). Teaching beyond the classroom walls: the pros and cons of cyber learning. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies,13, 1-7.
24. Johnston, J., Killion, J., & Oomen, J. (2005). Student satisfaction in the virtual classroom. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 3.
25. Leung, M., & Sharma, Y. (2020, February 21). Online Classes try to fill education gap during epidemic. University World News.
26. Marquez, L., Olivar, M., Brijuega, C., Ombar, R., Cerio, W. & Baes, F. (2019). Education and COVID-19: Experiences and insights from a Developing country. Access: Contemporary issues in education, 40(1), 84-90.
27. Molnar, A., Miron, G., Elgeberi, N., Barbour, M. K., Huerta, L., Shafer, S. R., & Rice, J. K. (2019). Virtual schools in the US 2019. National Education Policy Center.
28. Muirhead, W. (2000), ‘Online education in schools’, International Journal of Educational Management, 14(7), 315-324.
29. Murphy, M. (2020). COVID-19 and emergency eLearning: Consequences of the securitization of higher education for Post-pandemic pedagogy. Contemporary Security Policy, Advanced Online Publication.
30. McDonald, D. (1999-2000). Improved training methods through the use of multimedia technology. Journal Of Computer Information Systems, 40(2), 17-20.
31. Niemi, H. M., & Kousa, P. (2020). A case study of students’ and teachers’ perceptions in a Finnish highschool during the covid pandemic. International journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 352– 369.
32. Qi, W. (2017) ‘evaluating a virtual collaborative environment for interactive distance teaching and learning: A case study’. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 11-18.
33. Ryan, S. (2001). Is online learning right for you? American Agent & Broker, 73(6), 54-58.
34. Sintema, E. J. (2020). Effect of COVID-19 on the Performance of Grade 12 Students: Implications for STEM Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7), em1851.
35. Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R., & Koh, M. H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 59-70.
36. Shen, C., & Chuang, H. (2010). Exploring users’ attitudes and intentions toward the interactive Whiteboard technology environment. International Review on Computers and Software, 5(2), 200–208.
37. Steen, H.L. (2008). Effective eLearning design. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(4),526-532.
38. The Regional Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE) Working Group (2020). COVID19: How to include marginalized and vulnerable people in risk communication and community engagement. Available at: (accessed 10 July, 2021).
39. UNESCO. (2020). 1.37 billion students now home as COVID-19 school closures expand, Ministers scale up multimedia approaches to ensure learning continuity. Unesco.
40. UNESCO. (2020). Distance learning strategies in response to COVID-19 school closures. In UNESCO COVID-19 Education Response Education Sector issue notes.
41. Van Lancker, W., Parolin, Z. (2020). COVID-19, school closures, and child poverty: A social crisis in the making. Lancet Public Health 2020,5, 243–244.
42. World Health Organization. (2020). WHO Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19 -11 March 2020. Available online at: at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-202 (accessed July 3, 2021).
43. Yates, A., Starkey, L., Egerton, B., & Flueggen, F. (2020). High school students’ Experience of online learning during Covid-19: The influence of technology and padagogy. Technology, pedagogy and education, 9, 1-15.
44. Zhou, J., Zhang, Q. (2021). A survey Study on U.S. College students’ Learning Experience in COVID-19. Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 248.
How to Cite
Guzman, A.J.C. de 2022. Academic amidst Pandemic: A Survey of the Learning Experiences among Filipino Undergraduate Students. International Journal on Integrated Education. 5, 5 (May 2022), 81-93. DOI: