Semantics and Linguocultural Characteristics of Some Uzbek Lexemes

  • Kadirova Barno Raimovna Doctor of Philosophy in Philological Sciences (PhD), Associate Professor of the Tashkent Institute of Chemical Technology
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/ijie.v5i5.3058
Keywords: Ancient Uzbek language, lexical unit, etymology, semantics, lexeme, seme, linguoculturology, semantic aspect, culturalseme, social function, discourse, myths, legends, customs, traditions, customsprinciples, symbols, human cognitive

Abstract

At a time when international relations are developing and interaction is intensifying, the study of languages and cultures of different nations remains one of the urgent tasks. By the end of the twentieth century, linguistics had assumed that "language is not only connected with culture, but also a means by which it has grown out of culture and expressed it." At the same time, language plays an important role in the creation, development and preservation of culture (in the form of texts).

Today in the world the priority role of language in knowing the world, its active influence on the real being, consciousness, is recognized as the main factor and the main source in all spiritual and cognitive activity of the person, this fact forms a solid basis of anthropocentric approach to language.

The anthropocentric approach to language has been interpreted in almost all of the research and educational literature on linguoculturology, although it has been interpreted as re-emerging in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. it is emphasized that the background goes back to Humboldt’s famous ideas. V. von Humboldt said, "The diversity of languages is not only due to differences in sounds and signs, but also because of differences in the way we see the world." V. Humboldt's idea that "language is a mirror of culture" reflects the essence of the field of linguoculturology.

The article discusses the social function of the language, its role in society, cultural concepts, national values, traditions. Discusses the linguistic and cultural features of the Turkic languages, in particular Uzbek. The semantics of individual lexical units during the period of the ancient Uzbek literary language, linguistic and cultural capabilities, their importance in expressing national values and views are described. In addition to the denotative value in the lexical units of the lifestyle of the Uzbek people, the reflection of the concepts of human relations is explained by typical examples. Emphasizes the need to respect the national language, to consider it as a means of communication and as a reality that collects and expresses national values

References

1. Abdushukurov B.Zoonyms in the language of Turkic written sources of XI-XIV centuries. Candidate of Philological Sciences thesis autos tract.-Toshkent, 1998.-16 p.
2. Annotated dictionary of the language of AlisherNavoi's works. I − IV vol. –Tashkent, 1983−1985.- I − 656; II − 644; III − 624; IV – 636.
3. Attuhfatuz-zakiyatu-fil-lug'atitturkiya.-Tashkent: science , 1968. -280 p.
4. Bazarova D.X. Kyrgyz folk fishing termsT .: Science, 1978.-224 p.
5. BazarovaD.Kh. Names of horses // Bazarova D.Kh., Sharipova K.A. The development of the vocabulary of the Turkic languages of Central Asia and Kazakhstan.-Т .: Science, 1990.-С.12.
6. Begmatova D. M. THE ROLE OF PROFESSIONAL SOCIALIZATION OF YOUTH IN FAMILY AND THE IMPACT OF PEDAGOGICAL CONDITIONS ON ITS OF ENSURING //Theoretical & Applied Science. – 2020. – №. 11. – С. 244-249.
7. Biyaliev A. Kyrgyz folk terms of commercial hunting. Auto abstract of thesis. Candidate of Philology- Funze 1972.
8. Bobur Zaҳiriddin Muҳammad. Boburnoma. –Toshkent: Science, 1960; –Toshkent: “Sharқ” NMAK, 2002. –B. 336 +32 b.
9. Budagov L.Z. Comparative dictionary of Turkish - Tatar dialects. Volume I.-SPb. 1869/1960. -820 s .; Volume II SPb. 1871.- 417 p
10. Buranov M. Terms of animal husbandry in Uzbek dialects of Karakalpakstan. Autoabstract of thesis. Candidate of Philological Sciences-Tashkent 1972.
11. Gulbadanbegim Humoyunnoma. –Toshkent: Culture, 1998.-104 b.
12. The Ancient Turkic Dictionary.-L., 1969.
13. Muxtarovna B. D. et al. OILADA YOSHLARNING KASBIY IJTIMOIYLASHUVINI TA’MINLASHDA O ‘ZBEK XALQ IJODIYOTI //INTEGRATION OF SCIENCE, EDUCATION AND PRACTICE. SCIENTIFIC-METHODICAL JOURNAL. – 2021. – Т. 2. – №. 5. – С. 25-33.
14. Turkish Devon. I− III. –Tashkent, 1960−1963. I − 500 b.; II − 428 b .; III − 463 b.
15. Ibrahimov K. Ancient Turkic names of animals in the vocabulary of modern Turkic languages. Autoabstract of thesis. Candidate of Philological Sciences- M., 1975.
16. The historical development of the vocabulary of Turkic languages.-M .: Publishing house of the Academic Sciences, 1961.-S.162-172.
17. Ishakov F. A concise glossary for Boburnoma. - Andijan Publishing House, 2008.-236 p.
18. Ishakov M., Sodiqov Q., Omonov Q. Mangubitiglar.-Tashkent: TDShI, 2009.-112 p.
19. Musaev K.M. Vocabulary of Turkic languages in comparative coverage.-M., 1975; Shcherbak A.M. Names of domestic and wild animals. Inthebook: 7.
20. Dictionary of Navoi's works. Edited by PorsoShamsiev. –Tashkent, 1972. -784 p.
21. Nazarova X. Annotated dictionary of works of Zahiriddin Muhammad Babur.-Tashkent, 1972. -187 p.
22. Pavet de Сourteїlle A. Dictionnaire Turk – Oriental. Amsterdam: Philodress, 1972. -Р.538.
23. Nishonova N. Semantic analysis of the field of archetypal lexemes "animal" in the Uzbek language. Candidate of Philological Sciences. Auto abstract of thesist Tashkent, 2000. –p.-25.
24. Rahmatullaev Sh. Etymological dictionary of the Uzbek language (Turkish words). -Tashkent, 2000. -600 p.
25. Safarov M. Observations on the vocabulary of the Turkic languages // Studies on the vocabulary and grammar of the Turkic languages. –Toshkent: science, 1980. –S. 126.
26. Sevortyan E.V. Etymological dictionary of Turkic languages. –M.: Science, 1974−1989.
27. Tajik-Russian Dictionary. Edited by M.V. Rakhimi and L.V. Uspenskaya. –M .: State publication of foreign and national dictionaries, 1954.-789 p
28. Translator - a written monument of the XIV century. –Tashkent: science, 1980. -127 p.
29. Urunov T. Uzbek sheep breeding terminology (based on materials from the Kashkadarya region of the Uzbek SSR). Abstract of dissertation. Candidate of philological sciences. Samarkand, 1964; Buranov M. Terms of animal husbandry in Uzbek dialects of Karakalpakstan. Abstract of dissertation. Candidate of Philology. T., 1972; Khodzhamberdyev G. Livestock vocabulary of the Uzbek language (mainly on the materials of the Ferghana Valley). Abstract. diss. ... cand. filol. Sciences.-Tashkent, 1972; Usmanov S. Hippological terminology of modern Uzbek language. Abstract of dissertation. Candidate of philological sciences. Tashkent 1988.
30. Shcherbak A.M. Names of domestic and wild animals. Historical development of the vocabulary of Turkic languages.-M.: Publishing House-Academy of Sciences, 1961.-P.162-172.
31. Dictionary of Uzbek folk dialects.-Tashkent: Science, 1971.-407 p.
32. Annotated dictionary of the Uzbek language. -Tashkent: National Encyclopedia of Uzbekistan State Scientific Publishing House, 2006. I −680 p .; II− 672 b .; III - 688 p .; IV - Tashkent, 2008. -608 p .; V - 592 b.
Published
2022-05-25
How to Cite
[1]
Raimovna, K.B. 2022. Semantics and Linguocultural Characteristics of Some Uzbek Lexemes. International Journal on Integrated Education. 5, 5 (May 2022), 184-192. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17605/ijie.v5i5.3058.
Issue
Vol. 5 No. 5 (2022): IJIE
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

In submitting the manuscript to the International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE), the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

License and Copyright Agreement

Authors who publish with International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE) agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE) published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.