Readiness for Online Learning among Social Studies Students During the Pandemic
Abstract
This Study is an attempt to measure the level of Readiness in Online Learning of Social Studies Students. Using the Student Readiness for Online Learning (SROL) Instrument developed by Florence Martin, Brandy Stamper, and Claudia Flowers. This study reports the level of Readiness of Social Studies Students from various universities in the Philippines, through the category of importance and confidence in the competencies the respondents possess as the basis of their Online Learning Readiness. The level of readiness was also measured in terms of the Respondents’ Gender. In addition, data were statistically analyzed using descriptive statistics. Result presented that Social Studies Students has a High Level of Readiness in both confidence and importance category. In terms of Gender there were no significant differences between the Male and Female Respondents.
References
2. Allam, S., Mohideen, R., Ramlan, A., & Kamal, R. (2020). Online distance learning readiness during Covid-19 outbreak among undergraduate students. International journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 642-657.
3. Alieto, E. (2019). Cognition as predictor of willingness to teach in the Mother Tongue and the Mother Tongue as a subject among prospective language teachers. Science International (Lahore), 31(1), 135-139.
4. Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.), Theory and practice of online learning, 15-44
5. Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y
6. Ates-Cobanoglu, A., & Cobanoglu, I. (2021, July). Do Turkish Student Teachers Feel Ready for Online Learning in Post-Covid Times? A Study of Online Learning Readiness. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 22.
7. Barrot, J. S., Llenares, I. I., & del Rosario, L. S. (2021). Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines. Education and Information Technologies. doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10589-x
8. Bates, A. (2005). Technology, e-Learning and Distance Education. London/New York: Routledge.
9. Borotis, S. & Poulymenakou, A. (2004). E-Learning Readiness Components: Key Issues to Consider Before Adopting e-Learning Interventions. In J. Nall & R. Robson (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2004--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1622-1629). Washington, DC,
10. Choucri, N., Maugis, V., Madnick, S., Siegel, M., Gillet, S., O’Donnel, S., Haghseta, F. (2003). Global e - readiness-for what. Center for eBusiness at MIT
11. Chung, E., Noor, N. M., & Mathew, V. N. (2020). Are you ready? An assessment of online learning readiness among university students. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 9(1), 301–317.
12. Dabbagh, N. (2007). The online learner: Characteristics and pedagogical implications. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3), 217–226.
13. Dada, D. (2006). E-Readiness for developing countries: Moving the focus from the environment to the users. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries,27(6), 1-14.
14. Das, s., Hossain, E., & Akter, K. (2021). Students' perception of online class during Covid 19 Pandemic: An ordered PROBIT model Estimation. International Journal of Academic research in progressive education and development, 392-401.
15. De Giusti, Armando. “Policy Brief: Education during COVID-19 and Beyond.” Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnología en Educación y Educación En Tecnología, no. 26, 2020.
16. Düzeylerinin akademik başarıya etkisi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(3), 219-241. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/kefad/issue/59449/854082
17. Demir Kaymak, Z., & Horzum, M. B. (2013). Relationship between Online Learning Readiness and Structure and Interaction of Online Learning Students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(3), 1792-1797.
18. Engin, M. (2017). Analysis of students' online learning readiness based on their emotional Intelligence level. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(12A), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051306
19. EROL, H. (2021). Views of social studies teachers on E-learning. International Education Studies, 14(6), 82. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v14n6p82
20. Gülbahar, Y. (2012). Study of developing scales for assessment of the levels of readiness and satisfaction of Participants in e-learning environments. Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 45(2), 119– 138. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001256
21. Huang, H.-M. (2002). Student perceptions in an online mediated environment. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(4), 405-422. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/64267/
22. Kusel, J., Martin, F., & Markic, S. (2020). University Students readiness for using digital media and online learning: comparison between Germany and the USA. Education sciences, 1-15.
23. Lau, C. Y., & Shaikh, J. M. (2012). The impacts of personal qualities on online learning readiness at Curtin Sarawak Malaysia (CSM). Educational Research and Reviews,7(20), 430.
24. Machado, C. (2007). Developing an e‐readiness model for higher education institutions: Results of a focus Group study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(1), 72-82.
25. Mafenya, P. N. (2013). An investigation of first-year students’ pedagogical readiness to e-learning and assessment in open and distance learning: a University of South Africa context. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(13), 353.
26. Martin, F., Brandy, S., & Flowers, C. (2020). Examining student perception of their readiness for online learning: Importance and confidence. Online Learning, 35 58.
27. Mosa, A. A., Mahrin, M. N. bin, & Ibrrahim, R. (2016). Technological aspects of e-learning readiness in higher education: A review of the literature. Computer and Information Science, 9(1), 113–127.
28. Pillay, H., Irving, K., & Tones, M. (2007). Validation of the diagnostic tool for assessing tertiary students’ readiness for online learning. High Education Research & Development, 26(2), 217-234.
29. Reyes, J., Grajo, J., Comia, L., Talento, M., Ebal L., & Mendoza, J. (2021). Assessment of Filipino Higher Education Students’ Readiness for e-Learning During a Pandemic: A Rasch Technique Application. Philippine Journal of Science 150(3), 1007-1018.
30. Robinson, D. L. (2008). Relationship of student self-directedness, computer self-efficacy, and student satisfaction to persistence in online higher education programs.
31. Smith, P. J. (2005). Learning preferences and readiness for online learning. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 25(1), 312.
32. Suryanti, Chandra, Y. S., & Kristiani. (2020). Kesalahan penyelesaian soal statistika tipe high order thinking skills berdasarkan teori Newman. Jurnal Tadris Matematika 3(2), 207- 218.
33. Taşkın, N. & Erzurumlu, K. (2021). Investigation into online learning readiness of higher education students during COVID-19 pandemic. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 24-39.
34. Unal Y, Alir G, Suydal I. 2014. Student’s readiness for e-learning: an assessment on Hacettepe University Department of Information Management. IMCW 423: 137 147.
35. Warner, D., Christie, G., & Choy, S. (1998). Readiness of VET clients for flexible delivery including on-line learning. Brisbane: Australian National Training Authority.
36. Yeşilyurt, Ferahim (2021). The Learner Readiness for Online Learning: Scale Development and University Students’ Perceptions. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 8(1). 29-42.
37. Yilmaz, R. (2017). Exploring the role of e-learning readiness on student satisfaction and motivation in flipped classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 251–260.
38. Yu, T. (2018). Examining construct validity of the student online learning readiness (SOLR) instrument using confirmatory factor analysis. Online Learning, 22(4), 277–288. doi: 10.24059/olj.v22i4.1297
39. Zimmerman, W. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2016). Online learning self-efficacy in students with and without online learning experience. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(3).
Copyright (c) 2022 Juspher G. Handang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE), the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE) published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.